e8vk
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Date of Report: August 10, 2009
(Date of earliest event reported)
EQUITY LIFESTYLE PROPERTIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Maryland
|
|
1-11718
|
|
36-3857664 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(Commission File No.)
|
|
(IRS Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
|
|
Identification
Number) |
|
|
|
|
|
Two North Riverside Plaza, Chicago, Illinois
|
|
60606 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(312) 279-1400
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy
the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General
Instruction A.2. below):
o |
|
Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|
o |
|
Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|
o |
|
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|
o |
|
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item 8.01 Other Events
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. (the Company) is filing this Current Report on Form 8-K
solely to reflect certain accounting adjustments with respect to the financial information
contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (2008
Form 10-K), which was filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2,
2009. This Current Report on Form 8-K shows the effects of the retrospective adoption on the 2008
Form 10-K of the following:
|
|
|
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160, Non-controlling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements (SFAS No.160), effective January 1, 2009,
the Company, for all periods presented, has reclassified the non-controlling interest for
Common OP Units from the mezzanine section under Total Liabilities to the Equity section of
the consolidated balance sheets. Based on the Companys analysis, Perpetual Preferred OP
Units will remain in the mezzanine section. The presentation of income allocated to Common
OP Units and Perpetual Preferred OP Units on the consolidated statements of operations has
been moved to the bottom of the statement prior to Net income available to Common Shares.
This reclassification has no effect on the Companys net income attributable to common
stockholders or funds from operations (FFO). |
Management does not believe the adjustments in accordance with SFAS No.160 have a material
effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements. The Company is filing this Form 8-K to
conform certain parts of Items 6 and 15 of the 2008 Form 10-K to the presentation of our
consolidated financial statements in our 2009 Form 10-Q filings for ease of comparability. Except
as described above, we have not modified or updated any disclosures in our 2008 Form 10-K. This
Current Report on Form 8-K should be read in conjunction with our 2008 Form 10-K.
This report includes certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. When used, words such as anticipate, expect,
believe, project, intend, may be and will be and similar words or phrases, or the
negative thereof, unless the context requires otherwise, are intended to identify forward-looking
statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and
uncertainties, including, but not limited to:
|
|
|
our ability to control costs, real estate market conditions, the actual rate of decline
in customers, the actual use of sites by customers and our success in acquiring new
customers at our Properties (including those recently acquired); |
|
|
|
|
our ability to maintain historical rental rates and occupancy with respect to Properties
currently owned or that we may acquire; |
|
|
|
|
our assumptions about rental and home sales markets; |
|
|
|
|
in the age-qualified Properties, home sales results could be impacted by the ability of
potential homebuyers to sell their existing residences as well as by financial, credit and
capital markets volatility; |
|
|
|
|
in the all-age Properties, results from home sales and occupancy will continue to be
impacted by local economic conditions, lack of affordable manufactured home financing and
competition from alternative housing options including site-built single-family housing; |
|
|
|
|
the completion of future acquisitions, if any, and timing with respect thereto and the
effective integration and successful realization of cost savings; |
|
|
|
|
ability to obtain financing or refinance existing debt on favorable terms or at all; |
|
|
|
|
the effect of interest rates; |
|
|
|
|
the dilutive effects of issuing additional common stock; |
|
|
|
|
the effect of accounting for the sale of agreements to customers representing a
right-to-use the Properties previously leased by Privileged Access under Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition in Consolidated Financial Statements, Corrected; and |
|
|
|
|
other risks indicated from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. |
These forward-looking statements are based on managements present expectations and beliefs
about future events. As with any projection or forecast, these statements are inherently
susceptible to uncertainty and changes in
circumstances. The Company is under no obligation to, and
expressly disclaims any obligation to, update or alter its forward-looking statements whether as a
result of such changes, new information, subsequent events or otherwise.
Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits
(d) Exhibits
The information contained in the attached exhibit is audited and should be read in conjunction
with the Registrants annual and quarterly reports filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Exhibit 23.1 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
Exhibit 99.1 Item 6. Selected Financial Data
Exhibit 99.2 Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EQUITY LIFESTYLE PROPERTIES, INC.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Thomas P. Heneghan
|
|
|
|
Thomas P. Heneghan |
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Michael B. Berman
|
|
|
|
Michael B. Berman |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
Date: August 10, 2009
exv23w1
Exhibit 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.
333-68473, No. 333-28469, No. 333-25295, and No. 33-76486, and Form S-3 No. 333-66550, No.
333-90813, No. 333-65515, No. 333-25297, No. 333-1710, No. 33-82902, No. 33-97288 and No.
333-159014) of Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc., and in the related Prospectuses, of our report
dated February 27, 2009 (except for the second paragraph of Note
2(s) and the last table and paragraph of
Note 5, as to which the date is August 10, 2009) with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc. included in this Current Report (Form
8-K).
/s/ ERNST
& YOUNG, LLP
ERNST
& YOUNG, LLP
Chicago, Illinois
August 10, 2009
exv99w1
Exhibit 99.1
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following table sets forth selected financial and operating information on a historical
basis. The historical operating data has been derived from the historical financial statements of
the Company. The following information should be read in conjunction with all of the financial
statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Consolidated Historical Financial Information
(Amounts in thousands, except for per share and property data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Years ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Property Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community base rental income |
|
$ |
245,833 |
|
|
$ |
236,933 |
|
|
$ |
225,815 |
|
|
$ |
213,280 |
|
|
$ |
204,190 |
|
Resort base rental income |
|
|
111,876 |
|
|
|
102,372 |
|
|
|
89,925 |
|
|
|
74,371 |
|
|
|
54,661 |
|
Right-to-use annual payments (2) |
|
|
19,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Right-to-use contracts current period, gross (2) |
|
|
10,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Right-to-use contracts, deferred, net of prior period
amortization (2) |
|
|
(10,611 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utility and other income |
|
|
41,633 |
|
|
|
36,849 |
|
|
|
30,643 |
|
|
|
27,367 |
|
|
|
24,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating revenues |
|
|
419,349 |
|
|
|
376,154 |
|
|
|
346,383 |
|
|
|
315,018 |
|
|
|
283,347 |
|
Property operating and maintenance |
|
|
152,363 |
|
|
|
127,342 |
|
|
|
116,179 |
|
|
|
103,832 |
|
|
|
91,812 |
|
Real estate taxes |
|
|
29,457 |
|
|
|
27,429 |
|
|
|
26,246 |
|
|
|
24,671 |
|
|
|
22,723 |
|
Sales and marketing, gross (2) |
|
|
7,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing, deferred commissions, net (2) |
|
|
(3,644 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property management |
|
|
25,451 |
|
|
|
18,385 |
|
|
|
17,079 |
|
|
|
15,919 |
|
|
|
12,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation
shown separately below) |
|
|
210,743 |
|
|
|
173,156 |
|
|
|
159,504 |
|
|
|
144,422 |
|
|
|
127,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from property operations |
|
|
208,606 |
|
|
|
202,998 |
|
|
|
186,879 |
|
|
|
170,596 |
|
|
|
155,960 |
|
|
Home Sales Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues from inventory home sales |
|
|
21,845 |
|
|
|
33,333 |
|
|
|
61,247 |
|
|
|
66,014 |
|
|
|
47,404 |
|
Cost of inventory home sales |
|
|
(24,069 |
) |
|
|
(30,713 |
) |
|
|
(54,498 |
) |
|
|
(57,471 |
) |
|
|
(41,577 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross (loss) profit from inventory home sales |
|
|
(2,224 |
) |
|
|
2,620 |
|
|
|
6,749 |
|
|
|
8,543 |
|
|
|
5,827 |
|
Brokered resale revenues, net |
|
|
1,094 |
|
|
|
1,528 |
|
|
|
2,129 |
|
|
|
2,714 |
|
|
|
2,176 |
|
Home selling expenses |
|
|
(5,776 |
) |
|
|
(7,555 |
) |
|
|
(9,836 |
) |
|
|
(8,838 |
) |
|
|
(8,630 |
) |
Ancillary services revenues, net |
|
|
1,197 |
|
|
|
2,436 |
|
|
|
3,027 |
|
|
|
2,227 |
|
|
|
2,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from home sales operations and other |
|
|
(5,709 |
) |
|
|
(971 |
) |
|
|
2,069 |
|
|
|
4,646 |
|
|
|
1,653 |
|
|
Other Income (Expenses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
3,095 |
|
|
|
1,732 |
|
|
|
1,975 |
|
|
|
1,406 |
|
|
|
1,391 |
|
Income from other investments, net (3) |
|
|
17,006 |
|
|
|
22,476 |
|
|
|
20,102 |
|
|
|
16,609 |
|
|
|
3,475 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
(20,617 |
) |
|
|
(15,591 |
) |
|
|
(12,760 |
) |
|
|
(13,624 |
) |
|
|
(9,243 |
) |
Rent control initiatives |
|
|
(1,555 |
) |
|
|
(2,657 |
) |
|
|
(1,157 |
) |
|
|
(1,081 |
) |
|
|
(2,412 |
) |
Interest and related amortization |
|
|
(99,406 |
) |
|
|
(103,070 |
) |
|
|
(103,161 |
) |
|
|
(100,712 |
) |
|
|
(91,154 |
) |
Loss on early debt retirement (4) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,630 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation on corporate assets |
|
|
(390 |
) |
|
|
(437 |
) |
|
|
(410 |
) |
|
|
(804 |
) |
|
|
(1,657 |
) |
Depreciation on real estate assets and other costs |
|
|
(66,193 |
) |
|
|
(63,554 |
) |
|
|
(60,276 |
) |
|
|
(55,608 |
) |
|
|
(47,467 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expenses, net |
|
|
(168,084 |
) |
|
|
(161,101 |
) |
|
|
(155,687 |
) |
|
|
(174,444 |
) |
|
|
(147,067 |
) |
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
3,753 |
|
|
|
2,696 |
|
|
|
3,583 |
|
|
|
6,508 |
|
|
|
3,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated income from continuing operations |
|
|
38,566 |
|
|
|
43,622 |
|
|
|
36,844 |
|
|
|
7,306 |
|
|
|
14,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
1,927 |
|
|
|
2,750 |
|
Depreciation on discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(410 |
) |
|
|
(1,427 |
) |
(Loss) gain on sale of discontinued properties and
other |
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
12,036 |
|
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
|
2,279 |
|
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
12,325 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
3,796 |
|
|
|
1,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net income |
|
|
38,744 |
|
|
|
55,947 |
|
|
|
37,088 |
|
|
|
11,102 |
|
|
|
16,246 |
|
|
Income allocated to non-controlling interests: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common OP Units |
|
|
(4,297 |
) |
|
|
(7,705 |
) |
|
|
(4,318 |
) |
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
(936 |
) |
Perpetual Preferred OP Units (5) |
|
|
(16,144 |
) |
|
|
(16,140 |
) |
|
|
(16,138 |
) |
|
|
(13,974 |
) |
|
|
(11,284 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available for Common Shares |
|
$ |
18,303 |
|
|
$ |
32,102 |
|
|
$ |
16,632 |
|
|
$ |
(2,333 |
) |
|
$ |
4,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Consolidated Historical Financial Information
(continued)
(Amounts in thousands, except for per share and property data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) As of December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Earnings per Common Share Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
(0.23 |
) |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
Net income (loss) available for Common Shares |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
1.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
Earnings per Common Share Fully Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.90 |
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
|
$ |
(0.23 |
) |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
Net income (loss) available for Common Shares |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
1.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
Distributions declared per Common Share outstanding |
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding basic |
|
|
24,466 |
|
|
|
24,089 |
|
|
|
23,444 |
|
|
|
23,081 |
|
|
|
22,849 |
|
Weighted average Common OP Units outstanding |
|
|
5,674 |
|
|
|
5,870 |
|
|
|
6,165 |
|
|
|
6,285 |
|
|
|
6,067 |
|
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding fully diluted |
|
|
30,498 |
|
|
|
30,414 |
|
|
|
30,241 |
|
|
|
29,366 |
|
|
|
29,465 |
|
|
Balance Sheet Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate, before accumulated depreciation (6) |
|
$ |
2,491,021 |
|
|
$ |
2,396,115 |
|
|
$ |
2,337,460 |
|
|
$ |
2,152,567 |
|
|
$ |
2,035,790 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
2,091,647 |
|
|
|
2,033,695 |
|
|
|
2,055,831 |
|
|
|
1,948,874 |
|
|
|
1,886,289 |
|
Total mortgages and loans |
|
|
1,662,403 |
|
|
|
1,659,392 |
|
|
|
1,717,212 |
|
|
|
1,638,281 |
|
|
|
1,653,051 |
|
Non-controlling interests Perpetual Preferred OP Units (5) |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
Total equity |
|
|
96,234 |
|
|
|
88,717 |
|
|
|
59,912 |
|
|
|
41,895 |
|
|
|
41,615 |
|
|
Other Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations (7) |
|
$ |
97,615 |
|
|
$ |
92,752 |
|
|
$ |
82,367 |
|
|
$ |
52,827 |
|
|
$ |
54,448 |
|
Total Properties (at end of period) |
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
Total sites (at end of period) |
|
|
112,074 |
|
|
|
112,779 |
|
|
|
112,956 |
|
|
|
106,337 |
|
|
|
102,178 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company contained in this Form 10-K.
Certain revenue amounts reported in previously issued statements of operations have been
reclassified in the attached statements of operations due to the Companys expansion of the
related revenue activity. |
|
|
|
Property operations and home sale operations are discussed in Item 7 contained in this Form
10-K. |
|
(2) |
|
New activity starting on August 14, 2008 due to the PA Transaction. See Privileged
Access discussion in Item 7 contained in this form 10K. |
|
(3) |
|
Between November 10, 2004 and August 13, 2008, Income from other investments, net
included rental income from the lease of membership Properties to Thousand Trails (TT) or
its subsequent owner, Privileged Access. On August 14, 2008, the Company acquired
substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities of Privileged Access, which
included the operations of TT. The lease of membership Properties to TT was terminated upon
closing. As a result of the lease termination, beginning August 14, 2008, Income from other
investments, net no longer included rental income from the lease of membership Properties.
See Note 2 (j) in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Form
10-K. |
|
(4) |
|
On December 2, 2005, we refinanced approximately $293 million of secured debt maturing
in 2007 with an effective interest rate of 6.8% per annum. This refinanced debt was
secured by two cross-collateralized loan pools consisting of 35 Properties. The
transaction generated approximately $337 million in proceeds from loans secured by
individual mortgages on 20 Properties. The blended interest rate on the refinancing was
approximately 5.3% per annum, and the loans mature in 2015. Transaction costs resulting
from early debt retirement were approximately $20.0 million. |
|
(5) |
|
During 2005, we issued $25 million of 8.0625% Series D and $50 million of 7.95% Series
F Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preference Units to institutional investors. Proceeds
were used to pay down amounts outstanding under the Companys lines of credit. |
|
(6) |
|
We believe that the book value of the Properties, which reflects the historical costs
of such real estate assets less accumulated depreciation, is less than the current market
value of the Properties. |
|
(7) |
|
Refer to Item 7 contained in this Form 10-K for information regarding why we present
funds from operations and for a reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure to net
income. |
exv99w2
Exhibit 99.2
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
EQUITY LIFESTYLE PROPERTIES, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
F-3 |
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2008 and 2007
|
|
F-4 |
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
F-5 and F-6 |
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
F-7 |
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
F-8 and F-9 |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
F-10 |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc.
(Equity Lifestyle Properties or the Company), as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders equity and cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008. Our audits also included the financial
statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15. These financial statements and schedules are
the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements and schedules based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial position of Equity Lifestyle Properties at December 31, 2008
and 2007, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2008, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedules, when considered in
relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material
respects the information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), Equity Lifestyle Properties internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated
February 27, 2009 (not included herein), expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
|
|
|
ERNST & YOUNG LLP |
|
|
Chicago, Illinois
February 27, 2009,
except for the second paragraph of Note 2(s) and the last table and paragraph of Note 5,
as to which the date is August 10, 2009
F-3
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
As of December 31, 2008 and 2007
(amounts in thousands, except for share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
541,979 |
|
|
$ |
541,000 |
|
Land improvements |
|
|
1,725,752 |
|
|
|
1,700,888 |
|
Buildings and other depreciable property |
|
|
223,290 |
|
|
|
154,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,491,021 |
|
|
|
2,396,115 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(561,233 |
) |
|
|
(494,211 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment in real estate |
|
|
1,929,788 |
|
|
|
1,901,904 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
45,312 |
|
|
|
5,785 |
|
Notes receivable, net |
|
|
31,799 |
|
|
|
10,954 |
|
Investment in joint ventures |
|
|
9,676 |
|
|
|
4,569 |
|
Rents and other customer receivables, net |
|
|
1,040 |
|
|
|
1,156 |
|
Deferred financing costs, net |
|
|
12,408 |
|
|
|
12,142 |
|
Inventory, net |
|
|
12,934 |
|
|
|
63,526 |
|
Deferred commission expense |
|
|
3,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
Escrow deposits and other assets |
|
|
45,046 |
|
|
|
33,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
2,091,647 |
|
|
$ |
2,033,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable |
|
$ |
1,569,403 |
|
|
$ |
1,556,392 |
|
Unsecured lines of credit |
|
|
93,000 |
|
|
|
103,000 |
|
Accrued payroll and other operating expenses |
|
|
66,656 |
|
|
|
34,617 |
|
Deferred revenue sale of right-to-use contracts |
|
|
10,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
8,335 |
|
|
|
9,164 |
|
Rents and other customer payments received in advance and security deposits |
|
|
41,302 |
|
|
|
37,274 |
|
Distributions payable |
|
|
6,106 |
|
|
|
4,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
1,795,413 |
|
|
|
1,744,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interests Perpetual Preferred OP Units |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value
10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value
100,000,000 shares authorized for 2008 and 2007;
25,051,322 and 24,348,517 shares issued and outstanding for 2008 and 2007,
respectively |
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
Paid-in capital |
|
|
320,084 |
|
|
|
310,803 |
|
Distributions in excess of accumulated earnings |
|
|
(241,609 |
) |
|
|
(240,098 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
|
78,713 |
|
|
|
70,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interests Common OP Units |
|
|
17,521 |
|
|
|
17,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Equity |
|
|
96,234 |
|
|
|
88,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Equity |
|
$ |
2,091,647 |
|
|
$ |
2,033,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
F-4
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
(amounts in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community base rental income |
|
$ |
245,833 |
|
|
$ |
236,933 |
|
|
$ |
225,815 |
|
Resort base rental income |
|
|
111,876 |
|
|
|
102,372 |
|
|
|
89,925 |
|
Right-to-use annual payments |
|
|
19,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Right-to-use contracts current period, gross |
|
|
10,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Right-to-use contracts, deferred, net of prior period
amortization |
|
|
(10,611 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utility and other income |
|
|
41,633 |
|
|
|
36,849 |
|
|
|
30,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating revenues |
|
|
419,349 |
|
|
|
376,154 |
|
|
|
346,383 |
|
Property operating and maintenance |
|
|
152,363 |
|
|
|
127,342 |
|
|
|
116,179 |
|
Real estate taxes |
|
|
29,457 |
|
|
|
27,429 |
|
|
|
26,246 |
|
Sales and marketing, gross |
|
|
7,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing, deferred commissions, net |
|
|
(3,644 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property management |
|
|
25,451 |
|
|
|
18,385 |
|
|
|
17,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating expenses (exclusive of
depreciation shown separately below) |
|
|
210,743 |
|
|
|
173,156 |
|
|
|
159,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from property operations |
|
|
208,606 |
|
|
|
202,998 |
|
|
|
186,879 |
|
Home Sales Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues from inventory home sales |
|
|
21,845 |
|
|
|
33,333 |
|
|
|
61,247 |
|
Cost of inventory home sales |
|
|
(24,069 |
) |
|
|
(30,713 |
) |
|
|
(54,498 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross (loss) profit from inventory home sales |
|
|
(2,224 |
) |
|
|
2,620 |
|
|
|
6,749 |
|
Brokered resale revenues, net |
|
|
1,094 |
|
|
|
1,528 |
|
|
|
2,129 |
|
Home selling expenses |
|
|
(5,776 |
) |
|
|
(7,555 |
) |
|
|
(9,836 |
) |
Ancillary services revenues, net |
|
|
1,197 |
|
|
|
2,436 |
|
|
|
3,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from home sales operations & other |
|
|
(5,709 |
) |
|
|
(971 |
) |
|
|
2,069 |
|
Other Income (Expenses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
3,095 |
|
|
|
1,732 |
|
|
|
1,975 |
|
Income from other investments, net |
|
|
17,006 |
|
|
|
22,476 |
|
|
|
20,102 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
(20,617 |
) |
|
|
(15,591 |
) |
|
|
(12,760 |
) |
Rent control initiatives |
|
|
(1,555 |
) |
|
|
(2,657 |
) |
|
|
(1,157 |
) |
Interest and related amortization |
|
|
(99,430 |
) |
|
|
(103,070 |
) |
|
|
(103,161 |
) |
Depreciation on corporate assets |
|
|
(390 |
) |
|
|
(437 |
) |
|
|
(410 |
) |
Depreciation on real estate assets |
|
|
(66,193 |
) |
|
|
(63,554 |
) |
|
|
(60,276 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expenses, net |
|
|
(168,084 |
) |
|
|
(161,101 |
) |
|
|
(155,687 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
3,753 |
|
|
|
2,696 |
|
|
|
3,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated income from continuing operations |
|
|
38,566 |
|
|
|
43,622 |
|
|
|
36,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
520 |
|
Depreciation on discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84 |
) |
(Loss) gain on sale of discontinued real estate |
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
12,036 |
|
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
12,325 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net income |
|
|
38,744 |
|
|
|
55,947 |
|
|
|
37,088 |
|
Income allocated to non-controlling interests: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common OP Units |
|
|
(4,297 |
) |
|
|
(7,705 |
) |
|
|
(4,318 |
) |
Perpetual Preferred OP Units |
|
|
(16,144 |
) |
|
|
(16,140 |
) |
|
|
(16,138 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available for Common Shares |
|
$ |
18,303 |
|
|
$ |
32,102 |
|
|
$ |
16,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
F-5
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
(amounts in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per Common Share Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available for Common Shares |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
1.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per Common Share Fully Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.90 |
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available for Common Shares |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
1.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions declared per Common Share outstanding |
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax status of Common Shares distributions deemed paid
during the year: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary income |
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term capital gain |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecaptured section 1250 gain |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding basic |
|
|
24,466 |
|
|
|
24,089 |
|
|
|
23,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding fully diluted |
|
|
30,498 |
|
|
|
30,414 |
|
|
|
30,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
F-6
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Changes In Stockholders Equity
For The Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
(amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess of |
|
Non-controlling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
interests |
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
Common OP |
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
Paid-in Capital |
|
Earnings |
|
Units |
|
Total Equity |
Balance, December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
226 |
|
|
$ |
299,444 |
|
|
$ |
(267,154 |
) |
|
$ |
9,379 |
|
|
$ |
41,895 |
|
Conversion of OP Units to common
stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(211 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock through
exercise of options |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,744 |
|
Issuance of common stock through
employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,074 |
|
Compensation expense related to stock
options and restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,122 |
|
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(926 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(926 |
) |
Issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
Adjustment for Common OP
Unitholders in the Operating
Partnership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,168 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,632 |
|
|
|
4,318 |
|
|
|
20,950 |
|
Distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,072 |
) |
|
|
(1,860 |
) |
|
|
(8,932 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
229 |
|
|
$ |
304,483 |
|
|
$ |
(257,594 |
) |
|
$ |
12,794 |
|
|
$ |
59,912 |
|
|
|
|
Conversion of OP Units to common
stock |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(659 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock through
exercise of options |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,580 |
|
Issuance of common stock through
employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,183 |
|
Compensation expense related to stock
options and restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,268 |
|
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(883 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(883 |
) |
Adjustment for Common OP
Unitholders in the Operating
Partnership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,480 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,102 |
|
|
|
7,705 |
|
|
|
39,806 |
|
Distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,606 |
) |
|
|
(3,544 |
) |
|
|
(18,149 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
236 |
|
|
$ |
310,803 |
|
|
$ |
(240,098 |
) |
|
$ |
17,776 |
|
|
$ |
88,717 |
|
|
|
|
Conversion of OP Units to common
stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,463 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock through
exercise of options |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,207 |
|
Issuance of common stock through
employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,501 |
|
Compensation expense related to stock
options and restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,162 |
|
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(600 |
) |
Adjustment for Common OP
Unitholders in the Operating
Partnership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,303 |
|
|
|
4,297 |
|
|
|
22,603 |
|
Distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,814 |
) |
|
|
(4,539 |
) |
|
|
(24,356 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
238 |
|
|
$ |
320,084 |
|
|
$ |
(241,609 |
) |
|
$ |
17,521 |
|
|
$ |
96,234 |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
F-7
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
(amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Cash Flows From Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net income |
|
$ |
38,744 |
|
|
$ |
55,947 |
|
|
$ |
37,088 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss (Gain) on sale of properties and other |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
(12,036 |
) |
|
|
192 |
|
Gain on sale of investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(914 |
) |
Depreciation expense |
|
|
68,700 |
|
|
|
65,419 |
|
|
|
62,581 |
|
Amortization expense |
|
|
2,956 |
|
|
|
2,894 |
|
|
|
2,795 |
|
Debt premium amortization |
|
|
(632 |
) |
|
|
(1,608 |
) |
|
|
(1,477 |
) |
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
(5,528 |
) |
|
|
(4,123 |
) |
|
|
(5,494 |
) |
Distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
3,717 |
|
|
|
5,052 |
|
|
|
3,449 |
|
Amortization of stock-related compensation |
|
|
5,162 |
|
|
|
4,268 |
|
|
|
3,122 |
|
Revenue recognized from right-to-use contract sales |
|
|
(340 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized commission expense related to right-to-use contract sales |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued long term incentive plan compensation |
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in provision for uncollectible rents receivable |
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
(294 |
) |
Increase in inventory reserve |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent and other customer receivables, net |
|
|
(236 |
) |
|
|
(152 |
) |
|
|
(147 |
) |
Inventory |
|
|
(5,129 |
) |
|
|
4,516 |
|
|
|
(8,059 |
) |
Deferred commission expense |
|
|
(3,756 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Escrow deposits and other assets |
|
|
(1,208 |
) |
|
|
(1,244 |
) |
|
|
229 |
|
Accrued payroll and other operating expenses |
|
|
1,564 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
2,188 |
|
Deferred revenue sales of right-to-use contracts |
|
|
10,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rents received in advance and security deposits |
|
|
(2,708 |
) |
|
|
2,573 |
|
|
|
4,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
113,962 |
|
|
|
122,792 |
|
|
|
99,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of rental properties |
|
|
(3,484 |
) |
|
|
(24,774 |
) |
|
|
(35,283 |
) |
Acquisition of Privileged Access |
|
|
1,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from disposition of rental properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from disposition of investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
Net tax-deferred exchange withdrawal (deposit) |
|
|
2,124 |
|
|
|
(2,294 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Joint Ventures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in |
|
|
(5,545 |
) |
|
|
(3,656 |
) |
|
|
(2,734 |
) |
Distributions from |
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
1,647 |
|
Net (borrowings) repayments of notes receivable |
|
|
(1,274 |
) |
|
|
11,091 |
|
|
|
(7,511 |
) |
Improvements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
(618 |
) |
|
|
(252 |
) |
Rental properties |
|
|
(15,319 |
) |
|
|
(15,970 |
) |
|
|
(14,605 |
) |
Site development costs |
|
|
(11,199 |
) |
|
|
(12,796 |
) |
|
|
(17,348 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(33,104 |
) |
|
|
(25,604 |
) |
|
|
(67,086 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
F-8
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
(amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from stock options and employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
4,708 |
|
|
|
3,734 |
|
|
|
3,818 |
|
Distributions to Common Stockholders, Common OP Unitholders, and
Perpetual Preferred OP Unitholders |
|
|
(38,921 |
) |
|
|
(32,014 |
) |
|
|
(23,575 |
) |
Stock repurchase and Unit redemption |
|
|
(600 |
) |
|
|
(883 |
) |
|
|
(926 |
) |
Lines of credit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds |
|
|
201,200 |
|
|
|
126,200 |
|
|
|
193,600 |
|
Repayments |
|
|
(211,200 |
) |
|
|
(154,400 |
) |
|
|
(200,100 |
) |
Principal repayments on disposition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,992 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Principal payments and mortgage debt payoff |
|
|
(224,442 |
) |
|
|
(16,169 |
) |
|
|
(16,751 |
) |
New financing proceeds |
|
|
231,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,247 |
|
Early debt retirement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,174 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(3,123 |
) |
|
|
(310 |
) |
|
|
(1,689 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(41,331 |
) |
|
|
(93,008 |
) |
|
|
(31,376 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
39,527 |
|
|
|
4,180 |
|
|
|
995 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
|
|
5,785 |
|
|
|
1,605 |
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year |
|
$ |
45,312 |
|
|
$ |
5,785 |
|
|
$ |
1,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for interest |
|
$ |
96,668 |
|
|
$ |
101,206 |
|
|
$ |
103,368 |
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate acquisition and disposition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage debt assumed and financed on acquisition of real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,528 |
|
|
|
85,832 |
|
Mezzanine and joint venture investments applied to real estate acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,297 |
|
|
|
32,716 |
|
Other assets and liabilities, net, acquired on acquisition of real estate |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
932 |
|
|
|
2,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from loan to pay insurance premiums |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,344 |
|
|
|
3,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory reclassified to Buildings and other depreciable property |
|
|
57,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of operations of Privileged Access |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumption of assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory |
|
|
2,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Escrow deposits and other assets |
|
|
12,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued payroll and other operating expenses |
|
|
15,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rents and other customer payments received in advance and security
deposits |
|
|
19,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes receivable |
|
|
19,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in real estate |
|
|
6,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt assumed and financed on acquisition |
|
|
7,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
F-9
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 Organization of the Company and Basis of Presentation
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc., a Maryland corporation, together with MHC Operating Limited
Partnership (the Operating Partnership) and other consolidated subsidiaries (Subsidiaries), is
referred to herein as the Company, ELS, we, us, and our. The Company is a fully
integrated owner and operator of lifestyle-oriented properties (Properties). The Company leases
individual developed areas (sites) with access to utilities for placement of factory built homes,
cottages, cabins or recreational vehicles (RVs). At certain Properties, the Company provides
access to its sites through right-to-use or membership contracts. We believe that we have
qualified for taxation as a real estate investment trust (REIT) for U.S. federal income tax
purposes since our taxable year ended December 31, 1993. We plan to continue to meet the
requirements for taxation as a REIT. Many of these requirements, however, are highly technical and
complex. We cannot, therefore, guarantee that we have qualified or will qualify in the future as a
REIT. The determination that we are a REIT requires an analysis of various factual matters that
may not be totally within our control and we cannot provide any assurance that the IRS will agree
with our analysis. For example, to qualify as a REIT, at least 95% of our gross income must come
from sources that are itemized in the REIT tax laws. We are also required to distribute to
stockholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income computed without regard to our deduction for
dividends paid and our net capital gain. The fact that we hold our assets through the Operating
Partnership and its subsidiaries further complicates the application of the REIT requirements. Even
a technical or inadvertent mistake could jeopardize our REIT qualification. Furthermore, Congress
and the IRS might make changes to the tax laws and regulations, and the courts might issue new
rulings that make it more difficult, or impossible, for us to remain qualified as a REIT. We do
not believe, however, that any pending or proposed tax law changes would jeopardize our REIT
qualification.
If we fail to qualify as a REIT, we would be subject to U.S. federal income tax at regular
corporate rates. Also, unless the IRS granted us relief under certain statutory provisions, we
would remain disqualified as a REIT for four years following the year we first failed to qualify.
Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company is subject to certain foreign,
state and local taxes on its income and property and U.S. federal income and excise taxes on its
undistributed income.
The operations of the Company are conducted primarily through the Operating Partnership. The
Company contributed the proceeds from its initial public offering and subsequent offerings to the
Operating Partnership for a general partnership interest. In 2004, the general partnership
interest was contributed to MHC Trust, a private REIT subsidiary owned by the Company. The
financial results of the Operating Partnership and the Subsidiaries are consolidated in the
Companys consolidated financial statements. In addition, since certain activities, if performed
by the Company, may cause us to earn income which is not qualifying for the REIT gross income
tests, the Company has formed taxable REIT subsidiaries, as defined in the Code, to engage in such
activities.
Several Properties acquired are wholly-owned by taxable REIT subsidiaries of the Company. In
addition, Realty Systems, Inc. (RSI) is a wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiary of the Company
that is engaged in the business of purchasing, selling and leasing homes that are located in
Properties owned and managed by the Company. RSI also provides brokerage services to customers at
such Properties. Typically, customers move from a Property but do not relocate their homes. RSI
may provide brokerage services, in competition with other local brokers, by seeking buyers for the
homes. Subsidiaries of RSI also lease from the Operating Partnership certain real property
within or adjacent to certain Properties consisting of golf courses, pro shops, stores and
restaurants.
On August 14, 2008, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and certain
liabilities of Privileged Access, LP (Privileged Access) for an unsecured note payable of $2.0
million (the PA Transaction). Prior to the purchase, Privileged Access was the tenant under a
12-year lease with the Company for 82 Properties that terminated upon the closing of our
acquisition. The $2.0 million unsecured note payable matures on August 14, 2010 and accrues
interest at 10 percent per annum. See Note 12 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
contained in this Form 10-K.
The limited partners of the Operating Partnership (the Common OP Unitholders) receive an
allocation of net income that is based on their respective ownership percentage of the Operating
Partnership that is shown on the Consolidated Financial Statements as Non-controlling Interests
Common OP Units. As of December 31, 2008, the Non-controlling Interests Common OP Units
represented 5,366,741 units of limited partnership interest (OP Units) which are convertible into
an equivalent number of shares of the Companys common stock. The issuance of additional shares of
common stock or common OP Units changes the respective ownership of the Operating Partnership for
both the Non-controlling Interests and the Company.
F-10
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
(a) Basis of Consolidation
The Company consolidates its majority-owned subsidiaries in which it has the ability to
control the operations of the subsidiaries and all variable interest entities with respect to
which the Company is the primary beneficiary. The Company also consolidates entities in which
it has a controlling direct or indirect voting interest. All inter-company transactions have
been eliminated in consolidation. The Companys acquisitions on or prior to December 31, 2008
were all accounted for as purchases in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 141, Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141). For business combinations for
which the acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2009, the purchase price of Properties will
be in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 141R, Business
Combinations, (SFAS No. 141R).
The Company has applied the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Interpretation No. 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (FIN 46R) an
interpretation of ARB 51. The objective of FIN 46R is to provide guidance on how to identify a
variable interest entity (VIE) and determine when the assets, liabilities, non-controlling
interests, and results of operations of a VIE need to be included in a companys consolidated
financial statements. A company that holds variable interests in an entity will need to
consolidate such entity if the company absorbs a majority of the entitys expected losses or
receives a majority of the entitys expected residual returns if they occur, or both (i.e., the
primary beneficiary). The Company has also applied Emerging Issues Task Force 04-5 Accounting
for investments in limited partnerships when the investor is the sole general partner and the
limited partners have certain rights (EITF 04-5) which determines whether a general partner or
the general partners as a group controls a limited partnership or similar entity and therefore
should consolidate the entity. The Company will apply FIN 46R and EITF 04-5 to all types of
entity ownership (general and limited partnerships and corporate interests).
The Company applies the equity method of accounting to entities in which the Company does
not have a controlling direct or indirect voting interest or is not considered the primary
beneficiary, but can exercise influence over the entity with respect to its operations and major
decisions. The cost method is applied when (i) the investment is minimal (typically less than
5%) and (ii) the Companys investment is passive.
As of December 31, 2007, the Bar Harbor joint venture was consolidated with the operations
of the Company as the Company has determined that as of December 31, 2007 we were the primary
beneficiary by applying the standards of FIN 46R.
(b) Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(c) Markets
We manage all our operations on a property-by-property basis. Since each Property has
similar economic and operational characteristics, the Company has one reportable segment, which
is the operation of land lease Properties. The distribution of the Properties throughout the
United States reflects our belief that geographic diversification helps insulate the portfolio
from regional economic influences. We intend to target new acquisitions in or near markets
where the Properties are located and will also consider acquisitions of Properties outside such
markets.
F-11
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
(d) Inventory
Inventory primarily consists of new and used Site Set homes and is stated at the lower of
cost or market after consideration of the N.A.D.A. Manufactured Housing Appraisal Guide and the
current market value of each home included in the home inventory. Inventory sales revenues and
resale revenues are recognized when the home sale is closed. Inventory is recorded net of an
inventory reserve as of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 of $0.5 million and $0.8
million, respectively. The expense for the inventory reserve is included in the cost of home
sales in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. Resale revenues are stated net of
commissions paid to employees of $0.7 million and $0.8 million for the years ended December 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively. (See Note 7 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
contained in this Form 10-K).
(e) Real Estate
In accordance with SFAS No. 141, we allocate the purchase price of Properties we acquire to
net tangible and identified intangible assets acquired based on their fair values. In making
estimates of fair values for purposes of allocating purchase price, we utilize a number of
sources, including independent appraisals that may be available in connection with the
acquisition or financing of the respective Property and other market data. We also consider
information obtained about each Property as a result of our due diligence, marketing and leasing
activities in estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired.
Real estate is recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed on
the straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. We use a 30-year
estimated life for buildings acquired and structural and land improvements, a
ten-to-fifteen-year estimated life for building upgrades and a three-to-seven-year estimated
life for furniture, fixtures and equipment. Used rental homes are depreciated based on its
model year with a minimum of 15 years and new rental homes are depreciated using a 20-year
estimated life from its model year down to a salvage value of 40% of the original costs.
Depreciation on rental homes is included in ancillary services, net. In connection with the PA
Transaction, we acquired approximately $2.0 million in used resort cottages. The used resort
cottages are depreciated using a 20-year estimate life and are included in corporate and other
depreciation.
The values of above-and below-market leases are amortized and recorded as either an
increase (in the case of below-market leases) or a decrease (in the case of above-market leases)
to rental income over the remaining term of the associated lease. The value associated with
in-place leases is amortized over the expected term, which includes an estimated probability of
lease renewal. Expenditures for ordinary maintenance and repairs are expensed to operations as
incurred and significant renovations and improvements that improve the asset and extend the
useful life of the asset are capitalized over their estimated useful life.
We periodically evaluate our long-lived assets, including our investments in real estate,
for impairment indicators. Our judgments regarding the existence of impairment indicators are
based on factors such as operational performance, market conditions and legal factors. Future
events could occur which would cause us to conclude that impairment indicators exist and an
impairment loss is warranted.
For Properties to be disposed of, an impairment loss is recognized when the fair value of
the Property, less the estimated cost to sell, is less than the carrying amount of the Property
measured at the time the Company has a commitment to sell the Property and/or is actively
marketing the Property for sale. A Property to be disposed of is reported at the lower of its
carrying amount or its estimated fair value, less costs to sell. Subsequent to the date that a
Property is held for disposition, depreciation expense is not recorded. The Company accounts
for its Properties held for disposition in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 144 Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS No.
144). Accordingly, the results of operations for all assets sold or held for sale have been
classified as discontinued operations in all periods presented.
F-12
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
(f) Identified Intangibles and Goodwill
We record acquired intangible assets and acquired intangible liabilities at their estimated
fair value separate and apart from goodwill. We amortize identified intangible assets and
liabilities that are determined to have finite lives over the period the assets and liabilities
are expected to contribute directly or indirectly to the future cash flows of the property or
business acquired. Intangible assets subject to amortization are reviewed for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be
recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of an intangible asset is
not recoverable and its carrying amount exceeds its estimated fair value.
The excess of the cost of an acquired entity over the net of the amounts assigned to assets
acquired (including identified intangible assets) and liabilities assumed is recorded as
goodwill. Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment at a level of reporting
referred to as a reporting unit on an annual basis, or more frequently if events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. An impairment loss for an asset group
is allocated to the long-lived assets of the group on a pro-rata basis using the relative
carrying amounts of those assets, unless the fair value of specific components of the reporting
group are determinable without undue cost and effort.
As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the carrying amounts of identified intangible assets, a
component of Escrow deposits and other assets on our consolidated balance sheets, were
approximately $4.2 million and $0, respectively. Amortization of identified intangibles assets
was approximately $129,000 and $0 as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
(g) Cash and Cash Equivalents
We consider all demand and money market accounts and certificates of deposit with a
maturity date, when purchased, of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The cash and
cash equivalents as of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 include approximately $0.4
million and $0 of restricted cash, respectively.
(h) Notes Receivable
Notes receivable generally are stated at their outstanding unpaid principal balances net of
any deferred fees or costs on originated loans, or unamortized discounts or premiums net of a
valuation allowance. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Discounts or
premiums are amortized to income using the interest method. In certain cases we finance the
sales of homes to our customers (referred to as Chattel Loans) which loans are secured by the
homes. The valuation allowance for the Chattel Loans is calculated based on a comparison of the
outstanding principal balance of each note compared to the N.A.D.A. value and the current market
value of the underlying manufactured home collateral.
Beginning August 14, 2008, as a result the PA Transaction, the Company also now provides
financing for nonrefundable upfront payments on sales of right-to-use contracts (Contracts
Receivable). Based upon historical collection rates and current economic trends, when a sale
is financed a reserve is established for a portion of the Contracts Receivable balance estimated
to be uncollectible. The allowance and the rate at which the Company provides for losses on its
Contracts Receivable could be increased or decreased in the future based on the Companys actual
collection experience. (See Note 8 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained
in this Form 10-K).
F-13
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
(i) Investments in Joint Ventures
Investments in joint ventures in which the Company does not have a controlling direct or
indirect voting interest, but can exercise significant influence over the entity with respect to
its operations and major decisions, are accounted for using the equity method of accounting
whereby the cost of an investment is adjusted for the Companys share of the equity in net
income or loss from the date of acquisition and reduced by distributions received. The income
or loss of each entity is allocated in accordance with the provisions of the applicable
operating agreements. The allocation provisions in these agreements may differ from the
ownership interests held by each investor. Differences between the carrying amount of the
Companys investment in the respective entities and the Companys share of the underlying equity
of such unconsolidated entities are amortized over the respective lives of the underlying
assets, as applicable. (See Note 6 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained
in this Form 10-K)
(j) Income from Other Investments, net
Income from other investments, net, primarily includes revenue relating to the Companys
former ground leases with Privileged Access of $15.8 million and $20.6 million for the years
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The ground leases were terminated on August 14,
2008 due to the PA Transaction. The ground leases with Privileged Access were for approximately
24,300 sites at 82 of the Companys Properties and were accounted for in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13, Accounting for Leases. The income for the
year ended December 31, 2008 includes an expense of $1.0 million of a lease restatement bonus
paid to Privileged Access in January 2008. In 2007, income from other investments, net also
includes a one-time gain of approximately $1.1 million earned in connection with a 2005
defeasance transaction.
(k) Insurance Claims
The Properties are covered against fire, flood, property damage, earthquake, windstorm and
business interruption by insurance policies containing various deductible requirements and
coverage limits. Recoverable costs are classified in other assets as incurred. Insurance
proceeds are applied against the asset when received. Recoverable costs relating to capital
items are treated in accordance with the Companys capitalization policy. The book value of the
original capital item is written off once the value of the impaired asset has been determined.
Insurance proceeds relating to the capital costs are recorded as income in the period they are
received.
Approximately 70 Florida Properties suffered damage from the four hurricanes that struck
the state during 2004 and 2005. As of February 3, 2009, the Company estimates its total claim
to exceed $21.0 million. The Company has made claims for full recovery of these amounts,
subject to deductibles. Through December 31, 2008, the Company has made total expenditures of
approximately $18.0 million and expects to incur additional expenditures to complete the work
necessary to restore the Properties to their pre-hurricanes condition. The Company has reserved
approximately $2.0 million related to these expenditures ($0.7 million in 2005 and $1.3 million
in 2004 ). Approximately $6.9 million of
these expenditures have been capitalized per the Companys capitalization policy through
December 31, 2008.
The Company has received proceeds from insurance carriers of approximately $8.8 million
through December 31, 2008. Approximately $0.6 million has been recognized as a gain on
insurance recovery, which is net of approximately $0.3 million of contingent legal fees and
included in income from other investments, net, as of December 31, 2008.
On June 22, 2007, the Company filed a lawsuit related to some of the unpaid claims against
certain insurance carriers and its insurance broker. See Note 17 in the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements contained in this Form 10-K for further discussion of this lawsuit.
F-14
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
(l) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Companys financial instruments include short-term investments, notes receivable,
accounts receivable, accounts payable, other accrued expenses, and mortgage notes payable. The
fair values of all financial instruments, including notes receivable, were not materially
different from their carrying values at December 31, 2008 and 2007.
(m) Deferred Financing Costs, net
Deferred financing costs, net include fees and costs incurred to obtain long-term
financing. The costs are being amortized over the terms of the respective loans on a level
yield basis. Unamortized deferred financing fees are written-off when debt is retired before
the maturity date. Upon amendment of the lines of credit, unamortized deferred financing fees
are accounted for in accordance with, Emerging Issues Task Force No. 98-14, Debtors Accounting
for Changes in Line-of-Credit or Revolving-Debt Arrangements (EITF No. 98-14). Accumulated
amortization for such costs was $13.1 million and $10.3 million at December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
(n) Revenue Recognition
The Company accounts for leases with its customers as operating leases. Rental income is
recognized over the term of the respective lease or the length of a customers stay, the
majority of which are for a term of not greater than one year. We will reserve for receivables
when we believe the ultimate collection is less than probable. Our provision for uncollectible
rents receivable was approximately $1.5 million and $1.2 million as of December 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively.
The sales of right-to-use contracts are recognized in accordance with Staff Accounting
Bulletin 104, Revenue Recognition in Consolidated Financial Statements, Corrected (SAB 104).
The Company will recognize the upfront non-refundable payments over the estimated customer life
which, based on historical attrition rates, the Company has estimated to be between one to 31
years. The current period sales of upfront non-refundable payments are reported on the Income
Statement in the line item titled Right-to-use contracts current period, gross. The
cumulative deferral of the upfront non-refundable payments are reported on the Balance Sheet in
the line item titled Deferred revenue sale of right-to use contracts. The deferral of
current period sales, net of amortization of prior period sales, is reported on the Income
Statement in the line item titled Right-to-use contracts, deferred, net of prior period
amortization. The decision to recognize this revenue in accordance with SAB 104 was made after
corresponding with the Office of the Chief Accountant at the SEC during September and October of
2008. The commissions paid on the sale of right-to-use contracts will be deferred and amortized
over the same period as the related sales revenue. The current period commissions paid are
reported on the Income Statement in the line item titled Sales and marketing, gross. The
cumulative deferrals of commissions paid are reported on the Balance Sheet in the line item
titled Deferred commissions expense. The deferral of current period commissions, net of
amortization of prior period commissions is reported on the Income Statement in the line item
titled Sales and marketing, deferred commissions, net.
Annual payments paid by customers under the terms of the right-to-use contracts are
deferred and recognized ratably over the one-year period in which the services are provided.
Income from home sales is recognized when the earnings process is complete. The earnings
process is complete when the home has been delivered, the purchaser has accepted the home and
title has transferred.
F-15
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
(o) Non-controlling Interests
Net income is allocated to Common OP Unitholders based on their respective ownership
percentage of the Operating Partnership. Such ownership percentage is calculated by dividing
the number of Common OP Units held by the Common OP Unitholders (5,366,741 and 5,836,043 at
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively) by the total OP Units held by the Common OP
Unitholders and the Company. Issuance of additional shares of common stock or Common OP Units
changes the percentage ownership of both the Non-controlling Interests and the Company.
Due in part to the exchange rights (which provide for the conversion of common OP Units
into shares of common stock on a one-for-one basis), such transactions and the proceeds there
from are treated as capital transactions and result in an allocation between stockholders
equity and Non-controlling Interests to account for the change in the respective percentage
ownership of the underlying equity of the Operating Partnership.
(p) Income Taxes
Due to the structure of the Company as a REIT, the results of operations contain no provision
for U.S. federal income taxes for the REIT. However, the Company may be subject to certain
foreign, state and local income, excise or franchise taxes. The Company paid federal, foreign,
state and local taxes of approximately $378,000 and $369,000 during the years ended December 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively, which includes taxes payable from activities managed through
taxable REIT subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2008, net investment in real estate and notes
receivable had a U.S. federal tax basis of approximately $1.5 billion and $32.3 million,
respectively.
The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48 Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes (FIN 48) an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 Accounting for Income
Taxes, on January 1, 2007. The adoption of FIN 48 resulted in no impact to the Companys
consolidated financial statements. The Company or one of its subsidiaries files income tax
returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various U.S. state jurisdictions and Canada. With few
exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non-U.S.
income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2005.
(q) Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Company recognizes all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. Derivatives
that are not hedges must be adjusted to fair value through income. If the derivative is a
hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair value of derivatives will
either be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities or firm
commitments through earnings or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item
is recognized in earnings. The Company currently does not have any derivative instruments.
(r) Stock Compensation
The Company adopted the fair-value-based method of accounting for share-based payments
pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation-Transition and Disclosure (SFAS No.148) and Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123(R), Share Based Payment (SFAS 123(R)). The Company uses the
Black-Scholes-Merton formula to estimate the value of stock options granted to employees (see
Note 13 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Form 10-K).
F-16
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
(s) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 162, The
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (SFAS No. 162). The Statement
identifies the sources of accounting principles and framework for selecting the principles to be
used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented
in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The purpose
is to remove the focus of setting the GAAP hierarchy from the auditor and giving the entity the
responsibility of setting the GAAP hierarchy. SFAS No. 162 is effective 60 days following the
SECs approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing amendments to AU
Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles. The Company does not believe SFAS No. 162 will have an impact on the consolidated
financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160,
Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements (SFAS No. 160), an amendment
of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51. SFAS No. 160 seeks to improve uniformity and
transparency in reporting of the net income attributable to non-controlling interests in the
consolidated financial statements of the reporting entity. The statement requires, among other
provisions, the disclosure, clear labeling and presentation of non-controlling interests in the
Consolidated Balance Sheet and Consolidated Income Statement. SFAS No. 160 is effective January
1, 2009 with early adoption prohibited. SFAS No. 160 will effect the presentation of minority
interest within the consolidated financial statements. All current and prior year amounts have
been reclassified to reflect our adoption of SFAS No. 160.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 141R,
Business Combinations, (SFAS No. 141R). SFAS No. 141R replaces FASB Statement No. 141 but
retains the fundamental requirements set forth in SFAS No. 141 that the acquisition method of
accounting (also known as the purchase method) be used for all business combinations and for an
acquirer to be identified for each business combination. SFAS No. 141R replaces, with limited
exceptions as specified in the statement, the cost allocation process in SFAS No. 141 with a
fair value based allocation process. SFAS No. 141R applies prospectively to business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual
reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Early application is not permitted.
The Company believes that the impact SFAS No. 141R will have on our consolidated financial
statements will depend on the size and nature of any business combination that is entered into
after the implementation date.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (SFAS No. 159). SFAS No.
159 permits companies to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at
fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing companies with the
opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and
liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS No.
159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The adoption of SFAS No.
159 is optional and the Company has elected not to adopt SFAS No. 159 for any of its financial
assets and financial liabilities.
(t) Reclassifications
Certain 2006 and 2007 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2008 presentation.
This reclassification had no material effect on the consolidated balance sheets or statement of
operations of the Company.
F-17
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 3 Earnings Per Common Share
Earnings per common share are based on the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during each year. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, Earnings Per
Share (SFAS No. 128) defines the calculation of basic and fully diluted earnings per share.
Basic and fully diluted earnings per share are based on the weighted average shares outstanding
during each year and basic earnings per share exclude any dilutive effects of options, warrants
and convertible securities. The conversion of OP Units has been excluded from the basic earnings
per share calculation. The conversion of an OP Unit to a share of common stock has no material
effect on earnings per common share.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common
share for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Numerators: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from Continuing Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations basic |
|
$ |
18,157 |
|
|
$ |
22,160 |
|
|
$ |
16,439 |
|
Amounts allocated to dilutive securities |
|
|
4,265 |
|
|
|
5,322 |
|
|
|
4,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations fully diluted |
|
$ |
22,422 |
|
|
$ |
27,482 |
|
|
$ |
20,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from Discontinued Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations basic |
|
$ |
146 |
|
|
$ |
9,942 |
|
|
$ |
193 |
|
Amounts allocated to dilutive securities |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
2,383 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations fully
diluted |
|
$ |
178 |
|
|
$ |
12,325 |
|
|
$ |
244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Available for Common Shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available for Common Shares basic |
|
$ |
18,303 |
|
|
$ |
32,102 |
|
|
$ |
16,632 |
|
Amounts allocated to dilutive securities |
|
|
4,297 |
|
|
|
7,705 |
|
|
|
4,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available for Common Shares
fully diluted |
|
$ |
22,600 |
|
|
$ |
39,807 |
|
|
$ |
20,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average Common Shares
outstanding basic |
|
|
24,466 |
|
|
|
24,089 |
|
|
|
23,444 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption of Common OP Units for Common Shares
Shares |
|
|
5,674 |
|
|
|
5,870 |
|
|
|
6,165 |
|
Employee stock options and restricted shares |
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average Common Shares
outstanding fully diluted |
|
|
30,498 |
|
|
|
30,414 |
|
|
|
30,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-18
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 4 Common Stock and Other Equity Related Transactions
On May 18, 2007 the stockholders approved the increase of authorized common stock from
50,000,000 to 100,000,000.
The following table presents the changes in the Companys outstanding common stock for the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (excluding OP Units of 5,366,741, 5,836,043 and
6,090,068 outstanding at December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Shares outstanding at January 1, |
|
|
24,348,517 |
|
|
|
23,928,652 |
|
|
|
23,479,753 |
|
Common stock issued through conversion of OP Units |
|
|
469,302 |
|
|
|
254,025 |
|
|
|
117,403 |
|
Common stock issued through exercise of options |
|
|
169,367 |
|
|
|
143,841 |
|
|
|
155,031 |
|
Common stock issued through stock grants |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
|
170,500 |
|
Common stock issued through ESPP and DRIP |
|
|
32,184 |
|
|
|
22,820 |
|
|
|
23,605 |
|
Common stock repurchased and retired |
|
|
(18,048 |
) |
|
|
(18,821 |
) |
|
|
(17,640 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares outstanding at December 31, |
|
|
25,051,322 |
|
|
|
24,348,517 |
|
|
|
23,928,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Companys percentage ownership of the Operating
Partnership was approximately 82.4% and 80.6%, respectively. The remaining approximately 17.6% and
19.4%, respectively, was owned by the Common OP Unitholders.
The following regular quarterly distributions have been declared and paid to common
stockholders and Non-controlling Interests since January 1, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution Amount |
|
For the Quarter |
|
Stockholder |
|
|
Per Share |
|
Ending |
|
Record Date |
|
Payment Date |
$0.0750
|
|
March 31, 2006
|
|
March 31, 2006
|
|
April 14, 2006 |
$0.0750
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
July 14, 2006 |
$0.0750
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
September 29, 2006
|
|
October 13, 2006 |
$0.0750
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
December 29, 2006
|
|
January 12, 2007 |
|
$0.1500
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
March 30, 2007
|
|
April 13, 2007 |
$0.1500
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
June 29, 2007
|
|
July 13, 2007 |
$0.1500
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
September 28, 2007
|
|
October 12, 2007 |
$0.1500
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
December 28, 2007
|
|
January 11, 2008 |
|
$0.2000
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
March 28, 2008
|
|
April 11, 2008 |
$0.2000
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
June 27, 2008
|
|
July 11, 2008 |
$0.2000
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
September 26, 2008
|
|
October 10, 2008 |
$0.2000
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
December 26, 2008
|
|
January 9, 2009 |
The Company adopted the 1997 Non-Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) in July 1997.
Pursuant to the ESPP as amended on May 3, 2006, certain employees and directors of the Company may
each annually acquire up to $250,000 of common stock of the Company. The aggregate number of
shares of common stock available under the ESPP shall not exceed 1,000,000, subject to adjustment
by the Companys Board of Directors. The common stock may be purchased monthly at a price equal to
85% of the lesser of: (a) the closing price for a share of common stock on the last day of the
offering period; and (b) the closing price for a share of common stock on the first day of the
offering period. Shares of common stock issued through the ESPP for the years ended December 31,
2008 and 2007 were 31,770 and 21,677, respectively.
F-19
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 5 Investment in Real Estate
Investment in Real Estate is comprised of (amounts in thousands):
Properties Held for Long Term
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
Investment in real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
539,702 |
|
|
$ |
538,723 |
|
Land improvements |
|
|
1,715,627 |
|
|
|
1,690,784 |
|
Buildings and other depreciable property |
|
|
222,699 |
|
|
|
153,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,478,028 |
|
|
|
2,383,178 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(557,130 |
) |
|
|
(490,108 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment in real estate |
|
$ |
1,920,898 |
|
|
$ |
1,893,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Properties Held for Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
Investment in real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
2,277 |
|
|
$ |
2,277 |
|
Land improvements |
|
|
10,125 |
|
|
|
10,104 |
|
Buildings and other depreciable property |
|
|
591 |
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,993 |
|
|
|
12,937 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(4,103 |
) |
|
|
(4,103 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment in real estate |
|
$ |
8,890 |
|
|
$ |
8,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land improvements consist primarily of improvements such as grading, landscaping and
infrastructure items such as streets, sidewalks or water mains. Buildings and other depreciable
property consist of permanent buildings in the Properties such as clubhouses, laundry facilities,
maintenance storage facilities, rental units and furniture, fixtures and equipment. See Note 7 in
the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Form 10-K for disclosure
regarding the reclassification of manufactured home inventory to Buildings and other depreciable
property during the year ended December 31, 2008.
All acquisitions have been accounted for utilizing the purchase method of accounting and,
accordingly, the results of operations of acquired assets are included in the statements of
operations from the dates of acquisition. Certain purchase price adjustments may be made within
one year following the acquisitions. We acquired all of these Properties from unaffiliated third
parties. During the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company acquired the
following Properties (dollars in millions):
1) During the year ended December 31, 2008, we acquired the following Properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing Date |
|
Property |
|
Location |
|
Total Sites |
|
Real Estate |
|
Debt |
|
Net Equity |
|
|
January 14, 2008 |
|
Grandy Creek |
|
Concrete, WA |
|
|
179 |
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
January 23, 2008 |
|
Lake George Schroon Valley |
|
Warrensburg, NY |
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-20
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 5 Investment in Real Estate (continued)
2) During the year ended December 31, 2007, we acquired the following Properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing Date |
|
Property |
|
Location |
|
Total Sites |
|
Real Estate |
|
Debt |
|
Net Equity |
|
|
January 29, 2007 |
|
Mesa Verde (a) |
|
Yuma, AZ |
|
|
345 |
|
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
|
$ |
3.5 |
|
|
$ |
2.4 |
|
June 27, 2007 |
|
Winter Garden (a) |
|
Winter Garden, FL |
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
August 3, 2007 |
|
Pine Island |
|
St. James City, FL |
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
September 26, 2007 |
|
Santa Cruz RV Ranch |
|
Scotts Valley, CA |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
October 11, 2007 |
|
Tuxbury Resort |
|
Amesbury, MA |
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
(b) |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Purchased remaining 75% interest in the two Diversified Investments joint venture
Properties above, in which we had an existing 25% joint venture ownership interest of $0.7
million. The gross purchase price for Mesa Verde includes $0.3 million in prepaid rent. |
|
(b) |
|
Net of approximately $0.1 million of market-to-market adjustment. |
Investment in real estate also increased due to the consolidation of the Bar Harbor joint
venture as of December 31, 2007. (See Note 6 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
contained in this Form 10-K)
3) During the year ended December 31, 2006, we acquired the following Properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing Date |
|
Property |
|
Location |
|
Total Sites |
|
Real Estate (a) |
|
Debt |
|
Net Equity |
|
|
March 22, 2006 |
|
Mezzanine Portfolio (a) |
|
Various (11 Properties) |
|
|
5,057 |
|
|
$ |
105.0 |
|
|
$ |
73.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.0 |
|
April 14, 2006 |
|
Thousand Trails Portfolio (b) |
|
Various (2 Properties) |
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
April 25, 2006 |
|
Mid-Atlantic Portfolio (c) |
|
Various (7 Properties) |
|
|
1,594 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
June 13, 2006 |
|
Tranquil Timbers (d) |
|
Door County, WI |
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
December, 2006 |
|
Diversified Portfolio (e) |
|
Various (4 Properties) |
|
|
1,660 |
|
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
December 15, 2006 |
|
Outdoor World Portfolio (f) |
|
Various (15 Properties) |
|
|
3,962 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Purchased remaining interest in the Mezzanine Portfolio in which we had initially
invested approximately $30.0 million to acquire preferred equity interests during the first
quarter of 2004. The purchase price of $105.0 million included our existing investment of
$32.2 million and our general partner investment of $1.4 million. Net working capital
acquired included $3.2 million of rents received in advance and $0.4 million in other net
payables. In connection with this acquisition we purchased $1.9 million of inventory. The
acquisition was funded by new debt financing of $47.1 million and assumed debt of
approximately $25.9 million. |
|
(b) |
|
The purchase price includes certain personal property acquired from Privileged Access
located throughout the Thousand Trails Portfolio. The Company leased back these Properties
to Privileged Access between April 14, 2006 and August 13, 2008. |
|
(c) |
|
The portfolio was acquired in exchange for $5.0 million in cash, and two Properties
previously held for sale, located in Indiana. The Company provided short-term seller
financing of $3.4 million at the time of closing which was repaid in full on August 21,
2006. Net working capital acquired included $0.6 million of rents received in advance.
The Company leased all 1,594 sites in the portfolio to Privileged Access between April 25,
2006 and August 13, 2008. |
|
(d) |
|
Net working capital acquired included approximately $0.2 million of rents received in
advance. |
|
(e) |
|
Purchased remaining 75% interest in four Diversified joint venture Properties in which
we had an existing 25% joint venture ownership interest of $0.6 million. Net working
capital acquired included $1.2 million of rents received in advance and $0.6 million of
escrow deposits. A portion of the purchase price was funded by assumed debt of
approximately $12.8 million. |
|
(f) |
|
The Company leased all 3,962 sites in the portfolio to Privileged Access between
December 15, 2006 and August 13, 2008.. |
F-21
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 5 Investment in Real Estate (continued)
We actively seek to acquire additional Properties and currently are engaged in negotiations
relating to the possible acquisition of a number of Properties. At any time these negotiations are
at varying stages which may include contracts to acquire certain Properties which are subject to
satisfactory completion of our due diligence review.
As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company has two Properties designated as held for
disposition pursuant to SFAS No. 144. The Company determined that these Properties no longer met
its investment criteria. As such, the results from operations of these two Properties are
classified as income from discontinued operations. The Properties classified as held for
disposition are listed in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property |
|
Location |
|
Sites |
Casa Village |
|
Billings, MT |
|
|
490 |
|
Creekside |
|
Wyoming, MI |
|
|
165 |
|
The remaining two Properties held for disposition were in various stages of negotiations and
the Company expects to sell these Properties for proceeds greater than their net book value.
During the three years ended December 31, 2008, the Company sold the following Properties. The
operating results have been reflected in discontinued operations.
|
1) |
|
On November 30, 2007, we sold Holiday Village, a 519-site all-age manufactured home
Property in Sioux City, Iowa for approximately $2.6 million. A gain of sale of
approximately $0.6 million was recognized in the fourth quarter of 2007. |
|
|
2) |
|
On July 6, 2007, the Company sold Del Rey, a 407-site manufactured home Property in
Albuquerque, New Mexico, for proceeds of approximately $13.0 million and recognized a gain
on sale of approximately $6.9 million. The proceeds were deposited in a tax-deferred
exchange account and the proceeds were subsequently used for the acquisition of Pine
Island and Tuxbury Resort discussed above. |
|
|
3) |
|
On January 10, 2007, the Company sold, Lazy Lakes, a 100-site resort Property in the
Florida Keys for proceeds of approximately $7.7 million and recognized a gain on sale of
approximately $4.6 million. The proceeds were deposited in a tax-deferred exchange account
and were subsequently used for the acquisitions of Winter Garden and Mesa Verde discussed
above. |
|
|
4) |
|
During the year ended December 31, 2006, we exchanged two Properties located in
Indiana as part of the Mid-Atlantic Portfolio acquisition. A loss on sale of
approximately $0.2 million was recorded during the second quarter of 2006. |
The following table summarizes the combined results of operations of Properties held for sale or
sold during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Rental income |
|
$ |
2,121 |
|
|
$ |
3,020 |
|
|
$ |
3,920 |
|
Utility and other income |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating revenues |
|
|
2,276 |
|
|
|
3,263 |
|
|
|
4,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating expenses |
|
|
(1,101 |
) |
|
|
(1,972 |
) |
|
|
(2,696 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from property operations |
|
|
1,175 |
|
|
|
1,291 |
|
|
|
1,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from home sales operations and other |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
Interest and amortization |
|
|
(926 |
) |
|
|
(937 |
) |
|
|
(1,060 |
) |
Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expenses |
|
|
(926 |
) |
|
|
(937 |
) |
|
|
(1,144 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) gain on sale |
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
12,036 |
|
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
178 |
|
|
$ |
12,325 |
|
|
$ |
244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-22
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 6 Investment in Joint Ventures
During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company invested approximately $5.7 million to
acquire an additional 25% interest in Voyager RV Resort, increasing the Companys ownership
interest to 50%. The additional investment was determined on a total purchase price of $50.5
million and mortgage debt of $22.5 million. The Company exercised its option to acquire the
remaining percentage of Bar Harbor joint venture from its joint venture partner. Under the formula
provided for in the call option section of the joint venture agreement, no additional consideration
was required to be paid to exercise the option and the Company now owns 100 percent of the three
Bar Harbor Properties. The Company sold its 25% interest in the four Morgan Portfolio joint
ventures known as New Point in New Point, Virginia, Virginia Park in Old Orchard Beach, Maine, Club
Naples in Naples, Florida and Gwynns Island in Gwynn, Virginia, for a sales price of approximately
$2.1 million. The sales price for the four Morgan Portfolio joint ventures was based on a total
sales price of approximately $25.7 million net of mortgage debt of approximately $17.2 million. A
gain on the sale of approximately $1.6 million was recognized. The Company also received
approximately $0.4 million held for the initial investment in one of the Morgan Properties.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company received approximately $4.2 million in
distributions from our joint ventures. $3.7 million of these distributions were classified as
return on capital and were included in operating activities. The remaining distributions of
approximately $0.5 million were classified as a return of capital and were included in investing
activities and were related to the sale of the Companies 25% interest in four of our joint venture
Properties. Approximately $2.7 million of the distributions received exceeded the Companys basis
in its joint venture and as such were recorded in income from unconsolidated joint ventures. Of
these distributions, $0.6 million relates to the gain on the payoff of our share of seller
financing in excess of our joint venture basis on one Lakeshore investment.
On February 13, 2009, the Company purchased the remaining 75% interest in the Diversified
Portfolio joint venture Properties in which we had an existing 25% joint venture interest. The
Properties are known as Robin Hill in Lenhartsville, Pennsylvania, Sun Valley in Bowmansville,
Pennsylvania and Plymouth Rock in Elkhart Lake, Wisconsin. Also on February 13, 2009, the Company
sold its 25% interest in the Diversified Portfolio joint ventures known as Round Top, in
Gettysburg, Pennsylvania and Pine Haven in Ocean View, New Jersey.
During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company invested approximately $2.7 million in
developing one of the Bar Harbor joint venture Properties, which resulted in an increase of the
Companys ownership interest per the joint venture agreement. As of December 31, 2007, the Bar
Harbor joint venture had been consolidated with the operations of the Company as the Company had
determined that as of December 31, 2007 we are the primary beneficiary by applying the standards of
FIN 46R. This consolidation had decreased the Companys investment in joint venture approximately
$11.1 million, with an offsetting increase in investment in real estate.
During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company received approximately $5.2 million in
distributions from our joint ventures. $5.1 million of these distributions were classified as
return on capital and were included in operating activities. The remaining distributions of
approximately $0.1 million were classified as a return of capital and were included in investing
activities and were related to refinancings at three of our joint venture Properties.
Approximately $2.5 million of the distributions received exceeded the Companys basis in its joint
venture and as such were recorded in income from unconsolidated joint ventures.
During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company invested approximately $1.1 million in
five joint ventures owning five Properties located in Florida, Massachusetts, Maine and two in
Virginia. The Company also invested approximately $1.6 million in developing one of the Bar Harbor
joint venture Properties, which resulted in an increase of the Companys ownership interest per the
joint venture agreement.
During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company received approximately $5.1 million in
distributions from our joint ventures. $3.5 million of these distributions were classified as
return on capital and were included in operating activities. The remaining distributions of
approximately $1.6 million were classified as a return of capital and were included in investing
activities. The return of capital distributions related to our sale of the Property owned by
Indian Wells joint venture and the sale of our interest in the Blazing Star joint venture.
F-23
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 6 Investment in Joint Ventures (continued)
The following table summarizes the Companys investment in unconsolidated joint ventures (with
the number of Properties shown parenthetically for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JV Income for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment as of |
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Economic |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
Investment |
|
Location |
|
Number of Sites |
|
Interest(a) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Meadows
|
|
Various (2,2)
|
|
|
1,027 |
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
$ |
406 |
|
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
$ |
838 |
|
|
$ |
698 |
|
Lakeshore
|
|
Florida (2,2)
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
890 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
Voyager
|
|
Arizona (1,1)
|
|
|
1,706 |
|
|
50%(b)
|
|
|
8,953 |
|
|
|
3,368 |
|
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
Maine Portfolio
|
|
Maine (0,0)(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(505 |
) |
Other Investments
|
|
Various (5,10)(d)
|
|
|
2,088 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
1,002 |
|
|
|
1,555 |
|
|
|
1,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,676 |
|
|
$ |
4,569 |
|
|
$ |
3,753 |
|
|
$ |
2,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The percentages shown approximate the Companys economic interest as of December
31, 2008. The Companys legal ownership interest may differ. |
|
(b) |
|
Voyager joint venture primarily consists of a 50% interest in Voyager RV Resort.
A 25% interest in the utility plant servicing the Property is included in Other
Investments. |
|
(c) |
|
As of December 31, 2007, the Bar Harbor joint venture was consolidated with the
operations of the Company. |
|
(d) |
|
During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company received funds held for the
initial investment in one of the Morgan Properties and sold its 25% interest in all four
remaining Morgan Properties. |
Note 7 Inventory
The following table sets forth Inventory as of the years ended December 31, 2008 and
2007 (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
New homes (1) |
|
$ |
7,944 |
|
|
$ |
51,083 |
|
Used homes (2) |
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
10,912 |
|
Other (3) |
|
|
5,143 |
|
|
|
2,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventory (4) |
|
|
13,399 |
|
|
|
64,356 |
|
Inventory reserve |
|
|
(465 |
) |
|
|
(830 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory, net of reserves |
|
$ |
12,934 |
|
|
$ |
63,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes 253 and 860 new units for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes 27 and 978 used units for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. |
|
(3) |
|
Other inventory primarily consists of merchandise inventory. The increase in the
balance since December 31, 2007 is primarily due to approximately $2.1 million of
merchandise and other inventory acquired in connection with the PA Transaction. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes $0.3 million of Properties currently held for sale as of December 31, 2008 and
2007. |
During the year ended December 31, 2008, $57.8 million of manufactured home inventory,
including reserves of approximately $0.8 million, was reclassified to Buildings and other
depreciable property. The inventory reclassified is primarily rented to customers on an annual
basis.
F-24
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 8 Notes Receivable
As of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company had approximately $31.8 million and
$11.0 million in notes receivable, respectively. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company has
approximately $12.0 million and $10.6 million, respectively, in Chattel Loans receivable, which
yield interest at a per annum average rate of approximately 8.8%, have an average term and
amortization of 5 to 15 years, require monthly principal and interest payments and are
collateralized by homes at certain of the Properties. These notes are recorded net of allowances
of $158,000 and $160,000 as of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. During the
year ended December 31, 2008, approximately $1.5 million was repaid and an additional $4.3 million
was loaned to customers.
In connection with the PA Transaction, we acquired approximately $19.6 million of Contracts
Receivable. As of December 31, 2008, the Company had approximately $19.5 million of Contracts
Receivables, including allowances of approximately $0.3 million plus discount amortization of
approximately $0.3 million. These Contracts Receivables represent loans to customers who have
purchased right-to-use contracts. The Contracts Receivable yield interest at a per annum average
rate of 16.2%, have a weighted average term remaining of approximately four years and require
monthly payments of principal and interest. During the period ended December 31, 2008,
approximately $4.0 million was repaid and an additional $4.0 million was loaned to customers.
As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had approximately $0.4 million in notes which
bear interest at a per annum rate of prime plus 0.5% and mature on December 31, 2011. The notes
are collateralized with a combination of common OP Units and partnership interests in certain joint
ventures.
Note 9 Long-Term Borrowings
Secured Debt
As of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company had outstanding mortgage
indebtedness on Properties held for long term of approximately $1,555 million and $1,542 million,
respectively, and approximately $14 million of mortgage indebtedness as of December 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007 on Properties held for sale. The weighted average interest rate on this mortgage
indebtedness for the years ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was approximately 5.9% per
annum and 6.1% per annum, respectively. The debt bears interest at rates of 5.0% to 10.0% per
annum and matures on various dates ranging from 2009 to 2019. Included in our debt balance are
three capital leases with balances of approximately $6.7 million and $6.6 million at December 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively, and imputed interest rates of 13.1% per annum. The debt encumbered a
total of 151 and 164 of the Companys Properties as of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, and
the carrying value of such Properties was approximately $1,694 million and $1,784 million,
respectively, as of such dates.
Financing, Refinancing and Early Debt Retirement
During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company closed on approximately $231.0 million of
new financing, on 15 manufactured home properties, with a weighted average interest rate of 6.01%.
We used the proceeds from the financing to pay-off approximately $245.8 million of mortgage debt on
28 manufactured home properties, with a weighted average interest rate of 5.54%. The proceeds were
also used to pay down amounts outstanding on our lines of credit.
During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company assumed $7.5 million in mortgage debt in
connection with the acquisitions of Mesa Verde and Winter Garden. Such debt was repaid in 2008.
In connection with the acquisition of Tuxbury, the Company financed $1.2 million of the purchase
price from the seller. The Company repaid approximately $1.9 million in mortgage debt in
connection with the 2007 sale of Lazy Lakes. Refer to Note 5 Investment in Real Estate for
further discussion of acquisition and disposition activity.
Also during the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company repaid approximately $9.4 million of
outstanding mortgage debt collateralized by two properties and paid down $7.7 million of the
mortgage debt on Tropical Palms RV Resort. The Tropical Palms RV Resort mortgage debt balance
remaining on December 31, 2007 was approximately $12.0 million and was repaid in July 2008.
In February 2009, the Company refinanced two mortgages with a stated interest rate of 6.38%
per annum for total proceeds of approximately $58.0 million.
F-25
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 9 Long-Term Borrowings (continued)
Unsecured Loans
We have two unsecured Lines of Credit (LOC) of $350 million and $20 million that bear
interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a maximum of 1.20% per annum, have a 0.15% facility fee, mature on
June 30, 2010, and have a one-year extension option. The weighted average interest rate for the
year ended December 31, 2008 for our unsecured debt was approximately 3.6% per annum. During the
year ended December 31, 2008, we borrowed $201.2 million and paid down $211.2 million on the lines
of credit for a net pay-down of $10.0 million funded by our operations. As of December 31, 2008,
the $370 million bank commitment had $277 million available for future borrowings.
In September 2007, we completed an amendment of our existing unsecured Lines of Credit (LOC)
to expand our borrowing capacity from $275 million to $350 million. Prior to the amendment, the
Company had a $225 million LOC and a $50 million LOC. The amendment increased the $225 million LOC
to $350 million and decreased the $50 million LOC to $20 million. The lines of credit continue to
accrue interest at LIBOR plus a maximum of 1.20% per annum, have a 0.15% facility fee, mature on
June 30, 2010, and have a one-year extension option. The Company incurred commitment and
arrangement fees of approximately $0.3 million to increase its borrowing capacity.
As of December 31, 2007, the $370 million bank commitment had $267 million available for
future borrowings. The weighted average interest rate for the year ended December 31, 2007 was
6.84%.
Other Loans
During 2007, we borrowed $4.3 million to finance our insurance premium payments. As of
December 31, 2007 this loan had been paid off.
Aggregate payments of principal on long-term borrowings for each of the next five years and
thereafter are as follows (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Amount |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
97,167 |
|
2010 |
|
|
323,814 |
|
2011 |
|
|
74,642 |
|
2012 |
|
|
20,618 |
|
2013 |
|
|
130,170 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
1,014,487 |
|
Net unamortized premiums |
|
|
1,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,662,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-26
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 10 Lease Agreements
The leases entered into between the customer and the Company for the rental of a site are
generally month-to-month or for a period of one to ten years, renewable upon the consent of the
parties or, in some instances, as provided by statute. Non-cancelable long-term leases are in
effect at certain sites within approximately 39 of the Properties. Rental rate increases at these
Properties are primarily a function of increases in the Consumer Price Index, taking into
consideration certain conditions. Additionally, periodic market rate adjustments are made as deemed
appropriate. Future minimum rents are scheduled to be received under non-cancelable tenant leases
at December 31, 2008 as follows (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Amount |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
72,153 |
|
2010 |
|
|
73,834 |
|
2011 |
|
|
54,981 |
|
2012 |
|
|
36,482 |
|
2013 |
|
|
28,943 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
46,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
313,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 11 Ground Leases
The Company leases land under non-cancelable operating leases at certain of the Properties
expiring in various years from 2013 to 2054, with terms which require twelve equal payments per
year plus additional rents calculated as a percentage of gross revenues. For the year ended
December 31, 2008, ground lease rent was approximately $1.8 million and for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006, ground lease rent was approximately $1.6 million. Minimum future
rental payments under the ground leases as of December 31, 2008 as follows (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Amount |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
1,887 |
|
2010 |
|
|
1,891 |
|
2011 |
|
|
1,895 |
|
2012 |
|
|
1,899 |
|
2013 |
|
|
1,888 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
20,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
29,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 12 Transactions with Related Parties
Privileged Access
On August 14, 2008, the Company closed on the PA Transaction by acquiring substantially all of
the assets and assumed certain liabilities of Privileged Access for an unsecured note payable of
$2.0 million. Prior to the purchase, Privileged Access had a 12-year lease with the Company for 82
Properties that terminated upon closing. At closing, approximately $4.8 million of Privileged
Access cash was deposited into an escrow account for liabilities that Privileged Access has
retained. The balance in the escrow account as of December 31, 2008 was approximately $3.2
million. In approximately two years, the excess cash in the escrow account, if any, will be paid
to the Company.
The preliminary purchase price allocation has been recorded as of August 14, 2008. The
preliminary allocation does not include a receivable for the contingent cash as the amount and
timing of collection is uncertain. Further adjustments to the purchase price allocation may be
necessary within the one-year allocation period allowed by FAS 141.
F-27
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 12 Transactions with Related Parties (continued)
Mr. McAdams, the Companys President effective January 1, 2008, owns 100 percent of Privileged
Access. The Company has entered into an employment agreement effective as of January 1, 2008 (the
Employment Agreement) with Mr. McAdams which provides for an initial term of three years, but
such Employment Agreement can be terminated at any time. The Employment Agreement provides for a
minimum annual base salary of $300,000, with the option to receive an annual bonus in an amount up
to three times his base salary. Mr. McAdams is also subject to a non-compete clause and to
mitigate potential conflicts of interest shall have no authority, on behalf of the Company and its
affiliates, to enter into any agreement with any entity controlling, controlled by or affiliated
with Privileged Access. Prior to forming Privileged Access, Mr. McAdams was a member of our Board
of Directors from January 2004 to October 2005. Simultaneous with his appointment as president of
Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc., Mr. McAdams resigned as Privileged Accesss Chairman, President
and CEO. However, he was on the board of PATT Holding Company, LLC (PATT), until the entity was
dissolved in 2008.
Mr. Heneghan, the Companys CEO, was a member of the board of PATT, pursuant to the Companys
rights under its resort Property leases with Privileged Access to represent the Companys interests
from April 14, 2006 to August 13, 2008. Mr. Heneghan did not receive compensation in his capacity
as a member of such board.
In connection with the PA Transaction, the Company hired most of the property employees and
certain property management and corporate employees of Privileged Access. Subsequent to the PA
Transaction, the Company has reimbursed Privileged Access for services provided by Privileged
Access employees retained by Privileged Access, which were necessary for the transition of the
former Privileged Access operations to the Company.
Privileged Access had the following substantial business relationships with the Company, which
were all terminated with the closing of the PA Transaction on August 14, 2008.
|
|
|
Prior to August 14, 2008, the Company was leasing approximately 24,300 sites at 82
resort Properties (which includes 60 Properties operated by a subsidiary of Privileged
Access known as the TT Portfolio) to Privileged Access or its subsidiaries. For the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 we recognized approximately $15.8 million,
$20.5 million, and $17.8 million, respectively, in rent from these leasing arrangements.
The lease income is included in Income from other investments, net in the Companys
Consolidated Statement of Operations. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, no payments and
$0.1 million in lease payments, respectively, remain to be received under these leases.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company reimbursed Privileged Access
approximately $2.7 million for capital improvements. In 2007, the Company made no
reimbursements to Privileged Access. |
|
|
|
|
Effective January 1, 2008, the leases for these Properties provide for the following
significant terms: a) annual fixed rent of approximately $25.5 million b) annual rent
increases at the higher of Consumer Price Index (CPI) or a renegotiated amount based
upon the fair market value of the Properties, c) expiration date of January 15, 2020, and
d) two 5-year extension terms at the option of Privileged Access. The January 1, 2008
lease for the TT Portfolio also included provisions where the Company paid Privileged
Access $1 million for entering into the amended lease. The $1 million payment was being
amortized on a pro-rata basis over the remaining term of the lease as an offset to the
annual lease payments and the remaining balance at August 14, 2008 of $0.9 million was
expensed and is included in Income from other investments, net during the year ended
December 31, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
The Company had subordinated its lease payment for the TT Portfolio to a bank that loaned
Privileged Access $5 million. The Company acquired this loan as part of the PA
Transaction and paid off the loan during the year ended December 31, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
From June 12, 2006 through July 14, 2008, Privileged Access had leased 130 cottage
sites at Tropical Palms, a resort Property located near Orlando, Florida. For the years
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, we earned approximately $0.8 million and $1.5 million,
respectively, in rent from this leasing arrangement. The lease income is included in
the Resort base rental income in the Companys Consolidated Statement of Operations. As
of December 31, 2008 and 2007, no payments and $0.4 million in lease payments were
outstanding, respectively, under this lease. The Tropical Palms lease expired on July
15, 2008, and the entire property was leased to a new independent operator for 12 years. |
F-28
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 12 Transactions with Related Parties (continued)
|
|
|
On April 14, 2006, the Company loaned Privileged Access approximately $12.3 million
at a per annum interest rate of prime plus 1.5%, maturing in one year and secured by
Thousand Trails membership sales contract receivables. During the year ended December
31, 2008 and 2007, we received no payments and principal repayments of $12.3 million,
respectively, and no amounts remain outstanding on this receivable. Interest income
recorded by the Company for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was zero and
approximately $0.5 million, respectively. There was no Interest receivable due as of
the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007. |
|
|
|
|
The Company previously leased 40 to 160 sites at three resort Properties in Florida,
to a subsidiary of Privileged Access from October 1, 2007 until August 14, 2008. The
sites varied during each month of the lease term due to the seasonality of the resort
business in Florida. For the year ended December 31, 2008, we recognized less than $0.2
million in rent from this leasing arrangement. The lease income is included in the
Resort base rental income in the Companys Consolidated Statement of Operations. As of
December 31, 2008, and December 31, 2007, no amounts were outstanding under this lease. |
|
|
|
|
The Company previously leased 40 to 160 sites at Lake Magic, a resort Property in
Clermont, Florida, to a subsidiary of Privileged Access from December 15, 2006 until
September 30, 2007. The sites varied during each month of the lease term due to the
seasonality of the resort business in Florida. For the year ended December 31, 2008, we
recognized approximately $0.2 million in rent from this leasing arrangement. The lease
income is included in the Resort base rental income in the Companys Consolidated
Statement of Operations. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, no amounts are outstanding
under this lease. |
|
|
|
|
The Company had an option to purchase the subsidiaries of Privileged Access,
including TT, beginning on April 14, 2009, at the then fair market value, subject to the
satisfaction of a number of significant contingencies (ELS Option). The ELS Option
terminated with the closing of the PA Transaction on August 14, 2008. The Company had
consented to a fixed price option where the Chairman of PATT could acquire the
subsidiaries of Privileged Access anytime before December 31, 2011. The fixed price
option also terminated on August 14, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Privileged Access and the Company previously agreed to certain arrangements in which
we utilized each others services. Privileged Access assisted the Company with
functions such as: call center management, property management, information technology,
legal, sales and marketing. During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company
incurred expenses of approximately $0.6 million for the use of Privileged Access
employees and no payments were payable to Privileged Access as of December 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007. The Company received approximately $0.1 million from Privileged
Access for Privileged Access use of certain Company information technology resources
during the year ended December 31, 2008. The Company and Privileged Access had engaged
a third party to evaluate the fair market value of such employee services. |
In addition to the arrangements described above, the Company had the following smaller
arrangements with Privileged Access. In each arrangement, the amount of income or expense, as
applicable, recognized by the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008 is less than $0.2
million and there are no amounts due under these arrangements as of December 31, 2008 or December
31, 2007.
|
|
|
Since November 1, 2006, the Company leased 41 to 44 sites at 22 resort Properties to
Privileged Access (the Park Pass Lease). The Park Pass Lease terminated with the
closing of the PA Transaction on August 14, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
The Company and Privileged Access entered into a Site Exchange Agreement beginning
September 1, 2007 and ending May 31, 2008. Under the Site Exchange Agreement, the
Company allowed Privileged Access to use 20 sites at an Arizona resort Property known as
Countryside. In return, Privileged Access allowed the Company to use 20 sites at an
Arizona resort Property known as Verde Valley Resort (a property in the TT Portfolio). |
F-29
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 12 Transactions with Related Parties (continued)
|
|
|
The Company and Privileged Access entered into a Site Exchange Agreement for a
one-year period beginning June 1, 2008 and ending May 31, 2009. Under the Site Exchange
Agreement, the Company allowed Privileged Access to use 90 sites at six resort
Properties. In return, Privileged Access allowed the Company to use 90 sites at six
resort Properties leased to Privileged Access. The Site Exchange Agreement was
terminated with the closing of the PA Transaction on August 14, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
On September 15, 2006, the Company and Privileged Access entered into a Park Model
Sales Agreement related to a Texas resort Property in the TT Portfolio known as Lake
Conroe. Under the Park Model Sales Agreement, Privileged Access was allowed to sell up
to 26 park models at Lake Conroe. Privileged Access was obligated to pay the Company
90% of the site rent collected from the park model buyer. All 26 homes have been sold
as of December 31, 2007. The Park Model Sales Agreement terminated with the closing of
the PA Transaction on August 14, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
The Company advertises in Trailblazer magazine that was published by a subsidiary of
Privileged Access prior to August 14, 2008. Trailblazer is an award-winning
recreational lifestyle magazine for active campers, which is read by more than 65,000
paid subscribers. Beginning on August 14, 2008, the Company began publishing
Trailblazer in accordance with the terms of the PA Transaction. |
|
|
|
|
On July 1, 2008, the Company and Privileged Access entered into an agreement, where
Privileged Access sold the Companys used resort cottages at certain Properties leased
to Privileged Access. The Company paid Privileged Access a commission for selling the
inventory and the agreement was terminated on August 14, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
On April 1, 2008, the Company entered into a lease for a corporate apartment located
in Chicago, Illinois for use by Mr. McAdams and other employees of the Company and
Privileged Access. The Company paid monthly rent payments, plus utilities and
housekeeping expenses and Mr. McAdams reimbursed the Company for a portion of the rent.
Prior to August 14, 2008, Privileged Access reimbursed the Company for a portion of the
rent and utilities and housekeeping expenses. Such lease terminated on December 31,
2008. |
Corporate headquarters
The Company leases office space from Two North Riverside Plaza Joint Venture Limited
Partnership, an entity affiliated with Mr. Zell, the Companys Chairman of the Board. Fees paid to
this entity amounted to approximately $689,000, $768,000 and $624,000 for the years ended December
31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, approximately $62,000 and
$0, respectively, were accrued with respect to this office lease.
Other
In January 2009, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with the son of Mr. Howard
Walker, to provide assistance with the Companys internet web marketing strategy. Mr. Walker is
Vice-Chairman of the Companys Board of Directors. The consulting agreement is for a term of six
months at a total cost of $48,000.
F-30
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 13 Stock Option Plan and Stock Grants
The Companys Stock Option and Stock Award Plan (the Plan) was adopted in December 1992 and
amended and restated from time to time, most recently effective March 23, 2001. Pursuant to the
Plan, officers, directors, employees and consultants of the Company are offered the opportunity (i)
to acquire shares of common stock through the grant of stock options (Options), including
non-qualified stock options and, for key employees, incentive stock options within the meaning of
Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code; and (ii) to be awarded shares of common stock
(Restricted Stock Grants), subject to conditions and restrictions determined by the Compensation,
Nominating, and Corporate Governance Committee of the Companys Board of Directors (the
Compensation Committee). The Compensation Committee will determine the vesting schedule, if any,
of each Option and the term, which term shall not exceed ten years from the date of grant. As to
the Options that have been granted through December 31, 2008 to officers, employees and
consultants, generally, one-third are exercisable one year after the initial grant, one-third are
exercisable two years following the date such Options were granted and the remaining one-third are
exercisable three years following the date such Options were granted. Stock Options are awarded at
the New York Stock Exchange closing price of the Companys common stock on the grant date. A
maximum of 6,000,000 shares of common stock are available for grant under the Plan and no more than
250,000 shares may be subject to grants to any one individual in any calendar year.
Grants under the Plan are made by the Compensation Committee, which determines the individuals
eligible to receive awards, the types of awards, and the terms, conditions and restrictions
applicable to any award. In addition, the terms of two specific types of awards are contemplated
under the Plan:
|
|
|
The first type of award is a grant of Options or Restricted Stock Grants of common stock
made to each member of the Board at the meeting held immediately after each annual meeting
of the Companys stockholders. Generally, if the director elects to receive Options, the
grant will cover 10,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price equal to the fair
market value on the date of grant. If the director elects to receive a Restricted Stock
Grant of common stock, he or she will receive an award of 2,000 shares of common stock.
Exercisability or vesting with respect to either type of award will be one-third of the
award after six months, two-thirds of the award after one year, and the full award after
two years. |
|
|
|
|
The second type of award is a grant of common stock in lieu of 50% of their bonus
otherwise payable to individuals with a title of Vice President or above. A recipient can
request that the Compensation Committee pay a greater or lesser portion of the bonus in shares of common stock. |
The Company adopted SFAS 123(R) on July 1, 2005, which replaced SFAS 123. Since the Company
had chosen to use the modified-prospective method for recognizing stock-based compensation and uses
the Black-Scholes-Merton Model for valuing the options, the result of the adoption had no material
impact of the Companys results of operations or financial position.
Restricted Stock Grants
In 2008, the Company awarded Restricted Stock Grants for 30,000 shares of common stock to Joe
McAdams in accordance with the terms of his Employment Agreement. These Restricted Stock Grants
vest over two years with one-third vesting on January 4, 2008, one-third vesting on January 1, 2009
and one-third vesting on January 1, 2010. The fair market value of these Restricted Stock Grants
was approximately $1.3 million as of the date of grant and is recorded as compensation expense and
paid in capital over the two- year vesting period.
In 2006, the Company awarded Restricted Stock Grants for 147,500 shares of common stock to
certain members of senior management of the Company. These Restricted Stock Grants vest over three
years. The fair market value of these Restricted Stock Grants was approximately $8.1 million as of
the date of grant and is recorded as compensation expense and paid in capital over the three-year
vesting period.
In 2004, the Company awarded Restricted Stock Grants for 135,000 shares of common stock to
certain members of senior management of the Company. These Restricted Stock Grants vest over three
years, but may be restricted for a period of up to ten years depending upon certain performance
benchmarks. The fair market value of these Restricted Stock Grants was approximately $5.0 million
as of the date of grant and is recorded as compensation expense and paid in capital over the
three-year vesting period.
F-31
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 13 Stock Option Plan and Stock Grants (continued)
In 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company awarded Restricted Stock Grants for 20,000, 18,000, and
23,000 shares of common stock, respectively, to directors with a fair market value of approximately
$929,000, $984,000, and $1,050,000 in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
The Company recognized compensation expense of approximately $4.6 million, $3.7 million and
$2.8 million related to Restricted Stock Grants in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Compensation
expense to be recognized subsequent to December 31, 2008 for Restricted Stock Grants not yet vested
was approximately $3.9 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average term of
0.5 years.
Stock Options
The fair value of each grant is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes-Merton
model. The following table includes the assumptions that were made and the estimated fair values:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumption |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
Expected life |
|
4 years |
|
4 years |
|
4 years |
Expected volatility |
|
|
16.9 |
% |
|
|
15.6 |
% |
|
|
15.4 |
% |
|
Estimated Fair Value
of Options Granted |
|
$ |
516,904 |
|
|
$ |
705,554 |
|
|
$ |
525,936 |
|
A summary of the Companys stock option activity, and related information for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Shares Subject |
|
Exercise Price Per |
|
|
to Options |
|
Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2006 |
|
|
983,791 |
|
|
$ |
20.62 |
|
Options granted |
|
|
140,000 |
|
|
|
46.66 |
|
Options exercised |
|
|
(155,031 |
) |
|
|
45.72 |
|
Options canceled |
|
|
(167 |
) |
|
|
17.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
968,593 |
|
|
|
24.85 |
|
Options granted |
|
|
165,000 |
|
|
|
54.86 |
|
Options exercised |
|
|
(143,854 |
) |
|
|
57.86 |
|
Options canceled |
|
|
(1,200 |
) |
|
|
17.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
988,539 |
|
|
|
30.88 |
|
Options granted |
|
|
135,000 |
|
|
|
44.36 |
|
Options exercised |
|
|
(169,367 |
) |
|
|
45.24 |
|
Options canceled |
|
|
(400 |
) |
|
|
16.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
953,772 |
|
|
|
34.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-32
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 13 Stock Option Plan and Stock Grants (continued)
The following table summarizes information regarding Options outstanding at December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
Range of |
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
Exercise Prices |
|
Options |
|
|
Life (in years) |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Life (in years) |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$15.69 to $18.99
|
|
|
241,221 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
16.72 |
|
|
|
241,221 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
16.72 |
|
$22.65 to $47.97
|
|
|
527,551 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
$ |
36.49 |
|
|
|
450,884 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
$ |
35.27 |
|
$48.33 to $55.23
|
|
|
185,000 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
$ |
54.15 |
|
|
|
116,663 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
$ |
54.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
953,772 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
$ |
34.92 |
|
|
|
808,768 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
$ |
32.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, 1,099,242 shares, 1,283,842 shares and 1,465,642
shares remained available for grant, respectively; of these 600,525 shares, 650,525 shares and
668,525 shares, respectively, remained available for Restricted Stock Grants.
Note 14 Preferred Stock
The Companys Board of Directors is authorized under the Companys charter, without further
stockholder approval, to issue, from time to time, in one or more series, 10,000,000 shares of $.01
par value preferred stock (the Preferred Stock), with specific rights, preferences and other
attributes as the Board may determine, which may include preferences, powers and rights that are
senior to the rights of holders of the Companys common stock. However, under certain
circumstances, the issuance of preferred stock may require stockholder approval pursuant to the
rules and regulations of The New York Stock Exchange. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the
Company issued no Preferred Stock.
Note 15 Long-Term Cash Incentive Plan
On May 15, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors approved a Long-Term Cash Incentive Plan
(the Plan) to provide a long-term cash bonus opportunity to certain members of the Companys
management and executive officers. The total cumulative payment for all participants (the
Eligible Payment) is based upon the Companys Compound Annual Funds From Operations Per Share
Growth Rate over the three-year period ending December 31, 2009. The Eligible Payment is further
adjusted upward or downward based on the Companys Total Return compared to a selected peer group.
The Company accounts for the Plan in accordance with SFAS 123(R). As of December 31, 2008, the
Company had accrued compensation expense of approximately $1.8 million related to the Plan.
Note 16 Savings Plan
The Company has a qualified retirement plan, with a salary deferral feature designed to
qualify under Section 401 of the Code (the 401(k) Plan), to cover its employees and those of its
Subsidiaries, if any. The 401(k) Plan permits eligible employees of the Company and those of any
Subsidiary to defer up to 60% of their eligible compensation on a pre-tax basis subject to certain
maximum amounts. In addition, the Company will match 100% of the participants contribution up to
the first 3% and then 50% of the next 2% for a maximum potential match of 4%.
In addition, amounts contributed by the Company will vest, on a prorated basis, according to
the participants vesting schedule. After five years of employment with the Company, the
participants will be 100% vested for all amounts contributed by the Company. Additionally, a
discretionary profit sharing component of the 401(k) Plan provides for a contribution to be made
annually for each participant in an amount, if any, as determined by the Company. All employee
contributions are 100% vested. The Companys contribution to the 401(k) Plan was $465,000,
$399,000, and $407,656, for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.
F-33
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 17 Commitments and Contingencies
California Rent Control Litigation
As part of the Companys effort to realize the value of its Properties subject to rent
control, the Company has initiated lawsuits against several municipalities in California. The
Companys goal is to achieve a level of regulatory fairness in Californias rent control
jurisdictions, and in particular those jurisdictions that prohibit increasing rents to market upon
turnover. Regulations in California allow tenants to sell their homes for a premium representing
the value of the future discounted rent-controlled rents. In the Companys view, such regulation
results in a transfer of the value of the Companys stockholders land, which would otherwise be
reflected in market rents, to tenants upon the sales of their homes in the form of an inflated
purchase price that cannot be attributed to the value of the home being sold. As a result, in the
Companys view, the Company loses the value of its asset and the selling tenant leaves the Property
with a windfall premium. The Company has discovered through the litigation process that certain
municipalities considered condemning the Companys Properties at values well below the value of the
underlying land. In the Companys view, a failure to articulate market rents for sites governed by
restrictive rent control would put the Company at risk for condemnation or eminent domain
proceedings based on artificially reduced rents. Such a physical taking, should it occur, could
represent substantial lost value to stockholders. The Company is cognizant of the need for
affordable housing in the jurisdictions, but asserts that restrictive rent regulation does not
promote this purpose because the benefits of such regulation are fully capitalized into the prices
of the homes sold. The Company estimates that the annual rent subsidy to tenants in these
jurisdictions may be in excess of $15 million. In a more well balanced regulatory environment, the
Company would receive market rents that would eliminate the subsidy and homes would trade at or
near their intrinsic value.
In connection with such efforts, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with the City
of Santa Cruz, California and that, pursuant to the settlement agreement, the City amended its rent
control ordinance to exempt the Companys Property from rent control as long as the Company offers
a long term lease which gives the Company the ability to increase rents to market upon turnover and
bases annual rent increases on the CPI. The settlement agreement benefits the Companys
stockholders by allowing them to receive the value of their investment in this Property through
vacancy decontrol while preserving annual CPI based rent increases in this age-restricted Property.
The Company has filed two lawsuits in federal court against the City of San Rafael,
challenging its rent control ordinance on constitutional grounds. The Company believes that one of
those lawsuits was settled by the City agreeing to amend the ordinance to permit adjustments to
market rent upon turnover. The City subsequently rejected the settlement agreement. The Court
initially found the settlement agreement was binding on the City, but then reconsidered and
determined to submit the claim of breach of the settlement agreement to a jury. In October 2002,
the first case against the City went to trial, based on both breach of the settlement agreement and
the constitutional claims. A jury found no breach of the settlement agreement; the Company then
filed motions asking the Court to rule in its favor on that claim, notwithstanding the jury
verdict. The Court postponed decision on those motions and on the constitutional claims, pending a
ruling on certain property rights issues by the United States Supreme Court.
The Company also had pending a claim seeking a declaration that the Company could close the
Property and convert it to another use which claim was not tried in 2002. The United States
Supreme Court issued the property rights rulings in 2005 and subsequently on January 27, 2006, the
Court hearing the San Rafael cases issued a ruling that granted the Companys motion for leave to
amend to assert alternative takings theories in light of the United States Supreme Courts
decisions. The Courts ruling also denied the Companys post trial motions related to the
settlement agreement and dismissed the park closure claim without prejudice to the Companys
ability to reassert such claim in the future. As a result, the Company filed a new complaint
challenging the Citys ordinance as violating the takings clause and substantive due process. The
City of San Rafael filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint. On December 5, 2006, the Court
denied portions of the Citys motion to dismiss that had sought to eliminate certain of the
Companys taking claims and substantive due process claims. The Companys claims against the City
were tried in a bench trial during April 2007. On July 26, 2007, the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California issued Preliminary Findings of Facts and Legal Standards,
Preliminary Conclusions of Law and Request for Further Briefing (Preliminary Findings) in this
matter. The Company filed the Preliminary Findings on Form 8-K on August 2, 2007. In August 2007,
the Company and the City filed the further briefs requested by the Court. On January 29, 2008, the
Court issued its Findings of Facts, Conclusions of Law and Order Thereon (the Order). The
Company filed the Order on Form 8-K on January 31, 2008. On March 14, 2008, the Company filed a
petition for attorneys fees incurred in the amount of approximately $6,800,000 plus costs of
approximately $1,274,000. The City also filed a petition for attorneys fees incurred in
F-34
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 17 Commitments and Contingencies (continued)
the amount of approximately $763,000 plus costs of approximately $58,000 in connection with the
jury verdict that found no breach of the settlement agreement (as described above). While the
City alleges it is the prevailing party on the settlement agreement issue, the Company asserts that
the outcome of the entirety of the case finding the ordinance unconstitutional means that the
Company is the prevailing party in the case. The parties have submitted briefs with respect to the
petitions for attorneys fees and costs, which remain pending before the court and there can be no
assurances as to the outcome of these petitions.
The Companys efforts to achieve a balanced regulatory environment incentivize tenant groups
to file lawsuits against the Company seeking large damage awards. The homeowners association at
Contempo Marin (CMHOA), a 396 site Property in San Rafael, California, sued the Company in
December 2000 over a prior settlement agreement on a capital expenditure pass-through after the
Company sued the City of San Rafael in October 2000 alleging its rent control ordinance is
unconstitutional. In the Contempo Marin case, the CMHOA prevailed on a motion for summary judgment
on an issue that permits the Company to collect only $3.72 out of a monthly pass-through amount of
$7.50 that the Company believed had been agreed to by the CMHOA in a settlement agreement. The
CMHOA continued to seek damages from the Company in this matter. The Company reached a settlement
with the CMHOA in this matter which allows the Company to recover $3.72 of the requested monthly
pass-through and does not provide for the payment of any damages to the CMHOA. Both the CMHOA and
the Company brought motions to recover their respective attorneys fees in the matter, which
motions were heard by the Court in January 2007. On January 12, 2007, the Court granted CMHOAs
motion for attorneys fees in the amount of $347,000 and denied the Companys motion for attorneys
fees. These fees have been fully accrued by the Company as of December 31, 2006. The Company
appealed both decisions. On September 19, 2008, the Court of Appeal affirmed the attorneys fees
rulings. The Company filed a Petition for a Rehearing of that appellate decision. On October 17,
2008, the Court of Appeal issued an order modifying its original opinion in certain respects
without changing its judgment. The Company petitioned the California Supreme Court for review of
the decision, which was denied. Accordingly, the Company will pay the CMHOAs attorneys fees as
previously ordered by the trial court and, to the extent required, incurred on appeal. The Company
believes that such lawsuits will be a consequence of the Companys efforts to change rent control
since tenant groups actively desire to preserve the premium value of their homes in addition to the
discounted rents provided by rent control. The Company has determined that its efforts to
rebalance the regulatory environment despite the risk of litigation from tenant groups are
necessary not only because of the $15 million annual subsidy to tenants, but also because of the
condemnation risk.
In June 2003, the Company won a judgment against the City of Santee in California Superior
Court (case no. 777094). The effect of the judgment was to invalidate, on state law grounds, two
(2) rent control ordinances the City of Santee had enforced against the Company and other property
owners. However, the Court allowed the City to continue to enforce a rent control ordinance that
predated the two invalid ordinances (the prior ordinance). As a result of the judgment the
Company was entitled to collect a one-time rent increase based upon the difference in annual
adjustments between the invalid ordinance(s) and the prior ordinance and to adjust its base rents
to reflect what the Company could have charged had the prior ordinance been continually in effect.
The City of Santee appealed the judgment. The Court of Appeal and California Supreme Court refused
to stay enforcement of these rent adjustments pending appeal. After the City was unable to obtain
a stay, the City and the tenant association each sued the Company in separate actions alleging the
rent adjustments pursuant to the judgment violate the prior ordinance (Case Nos. GIE 020887 and GIE
020524). They seek to rescind the rent adjustments, refunds of amounts paid, and penalties and
damages in these separate actions. On January 25, 2005, the California Court of Appeal reversed
the judgment in part and affirmed it in part with a remand. The Court of Appeal affirmed that one
ordinance was unlawfully adopted and therefore void and that the second ordinance contained
unconstitutional provisions. However, the Court ruled the City had the authority to cure the
issues with the first ordinance retroactively and that the City could sever the unconstitutional
provisions in the second ordinance. On remand, the trial court was directed to decide the issue of
damages to the Company from these ordinances, which the Company believes is consistent not only
with the Company receiving the economic benefit of invalidating one of the ordinances, but also
consistent with the Companys position that it is entitled to market rent and not merely a higher
amount of regulated rent. The remand action was tried to the court in the third quarter of 2007.
On January 25, 2008, the trial court issued a preliminary ruling determining that the Company had
not incurred any damages from these ordinances and actions primarily on the grounds that the
ordinances afforded the Company a fair rate of return. The Company sought clarification of this
ruling. On April 9, 2008, the court issued a final statement of decision that included a
clarification stating that the constitutional issues were not resolved on the merits and that the
court had not determined that the ordinances afforded the Company a fair rate of return outside the
remand period. The trial court granted a motion for restitution filed by the City in Case No. GIE
020524.
F-35
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 17 Commitments and Contingencies (continued)
The Company filed a notice of appeal on July 2, 2008. In order to avoid further trial and the
related expenses, the Company agreed to a stipulated judgment, which requires the Company to put
into escrow after entry of the judgment, pending appeal, funds sufficient to pay the judgment with
prejudgment interest while preserving the Companys appellate rights. The parties also disputed
whether the trial courts decision to award restitution encompassed an award of prejudgment
interest, as to which the parties submitted additional briefs to the trial court for decision. On
October 31, 2008, the court awarded the City some but not all of the prejudgment interest it
sought. The stipulated judgment was entered on November 5, 2008, and the Company deposited into
the escrow the amounts required by the judgment and continues to deposit monthly disputed amounts
until the disputes are resolved on appeal. The appeal is proceeding and briefing will commence
after the superior court has filed the supplemental record on appeal. The tenant association
continued to seek damages, penalties and fees in their separate action based on the same claims
made on the tenants behalf by the City in the Citys case. The Company moved for judgment on the
pleadings in the tenant associations case on the ground that the tenant associations case is moot
in light of the stipulated judgment in the Citys case. On November 6, 2008, the Court granted the
Companys motion for judgment on the pleadings without leave to amend. On February 9, 2009, the
tenant association filed a notice of intention to move for new trial in which it stated that it
intends to move the Court to set aside the order granting defendants motion for judgment on the
pleadings. That notice remains pending.
In addition, the Company has sued the City of Santee in federal court alleging all three of
the ordinances are unconstitutional under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States
Constitution. Thus, it is the Companys position that the ordinances are subject to invalidation
as a matter of law in the federal court action. Separately, the Federal District Court granted the
Citys Motion for Summary Judgment in the Companys federal court lawsuit. This decision was based
not on the merits, but on procedural grounds, including that the Companys claims were moot given
its success in the state court case. The Company appealed the decision, and on May 3, 2007 the
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the District Courts decision on
procedural grounds. The Company intends to continue to pursue an adjudication of its rights on the
merits in Federal Court through claims that are not subject to such procedural defenses.
In October 2004, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in State of Hawaii vs.
Chevron USA, Inc., a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals case that upheld the standard that a regulation
must substantially advance a legitimate state purpose in order to be constitutionally viable under
the Fifth Amendment. On May 24, 2005 the United States Supreme Court reversed the Ninth Circuit
Court of Appeals in an opinion that clarified the standard of review for regulatory takings brought
under the Fifth Amendment. The Supreme Court held that the heightened scrutiny applied by the
Ninth Circuit is not the applicable standard in a regulatory takings analysis, but is an
appropriate factor for determining if a due process violation has occurred. The Court further
clarified that regulatory takings would be determined in significant part by an analysis of the
economic impact of the regulation. The Company believes that the severity of the economic impact
on its Properties caused by rent control will enable it to continue to challenge the rent
regulations under the Fifth Amendment and the due process clause.
As a result of the Companys efforts to achieve a level of regulatory fairness in California,
a commercial lending company, 21st Mortgage Corporation, a Delaware corporation, sued
MHC Financing Limited Partnership. Such lawsuit asserts that certain rent increases implemented by
the partnership pursuant to the rights afforded to the property owners under the City of San Joses
rent control ordinance were invalid or unlawful. 21st Mortgage has asserted that it
should benefit from the vacancy control provisions of the Citys ordinance as if 21st
Mortgage were a homeowner and contrary to the ordinances provision that rents may be increased
without restriction upon termination of the homeowners tenancy. In each of the disputed cases,
the Company believes it had terminated the tenancy of the homeowner (21st Mortgages
borrower) through the legal process. The Court, in granting 21st Mortgages motion for
summary judgment, has indicated that 21st Mortgage may be a homeowner within the
meaning of the ordinance. The Company does not believe that 21st Mortgage can show that
it has ever applied for tenancy, entered into a rental agreement or been accepted as a homeowner in
the communities. A bench trial in this matter concluded in January 2008 with the trial court
determining that the Company had validly exercised its rights under the rent control ordinance,
that the Company had not violated the ordinance and that 21st Mortgage was not entitled
to the benefit of rent control protection in the circumstances presented. In April 2008, the
Company filed a petition for attorneys fees and costs. On August 22, 2008, the Court granted the
Company $0.4 million in attorneys fees and costs. On October 20, 2008, the Company entered a
Post-Judgment Agreement with 21st Mortgage pursuant to which 21st Mortgage
paid the Company the $0.4 million in attorneys fees and costs that the court had awarded, and the
parties agreed to let the trial courts judgment stand, to otherwise end the litigation, and
exchanged releases.
F-36
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 17 Commitments and Contingencies (continued)
Countryside at Vero Beach
On January 12, 2006, the Company was served with a complaint filed in Indian River County
Circuit Court on behalf of a purported class of homeowners at Countryside at Vero Beach. The
complaint includes counts for alleged violations of the Florida Mobile Home Act and the Florida
Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, and claims that the Company required homeowners to pay
water and sewer impact fees, either to the Company or to the County, as a condition of initial or
continued occupancy in the Park, without properly disclosing the fees in advance and
notwithstanding the Companys position that all such fees were fully paid in connection with the
settlement agreement described above. On February 8, 2006, the Company served its motion to
dismiss the complaint. In May 2007, the Court granted the Companys motion to dismiss, but also
allowed the plaintiff to amend the complaint. The plaintiff filed an amended complaint, which the
Company has also moved to dismiss. Before any ruling on the Companys motion to dismiss the
amended complaint, the plaintiff asked for and received leave to file a second amended complaint,
which the plaintiff filed on April 11, 2008. On May 1, 2008, the Company filed an answer and a
motion for summary judgment. The motion for summary judgment was denied with leave to resubmit
the motion after further discovery. On or about February 4, 2009, the Company accepted the
Plaintiffs offer to voluntarily dismiss the case with prejudice in exchange for the Companys
waiver of any claim for attorneys fees.
Colony Park
On December 1, 2006, a group of tenants at the Companys Colony Park Property in Ceres,
California filed a complaint in the California Superior Court for Stanislaus County alleging that
the Company has failed to properly maintain the Property and has improperly reduced the services
provided to the tenants, among other allegations. The Company has answered the complaint by
denying all material allegations and filed a counterclaim for declaratory relief and damages. The
case will proceed in Superior Court because the Companys motion to compel arbitration was denied
and the denial was upheld on appeal. Discovery has commenced. The Company has filed a motion for
summary adjudication of various of the plaintiffs claims and allegations, which is scheduled for
hearing on November 19, 2008. The Court has set a trial date for August 4, 2009. The Company
believes that the allegations in the first amended complaint are without merit, and intends to
vigorously defend the lawsuit.
Californias Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) issued a Notice of
Violation dated August 21, 2006 regarding the sewer system at Colony Park. The notice ordered the
Company to replace the Propertys sewer system or show justification from a third party explaining
why the sewer system does not need to be replaced. The Company has provided such third party
report to HCD and believes that the sewer system does not need to be replaced. Based upon
information provided by the Company to HCD to date, HCD has indicated that it agrees that the
entire system does not need to be replaced.
Hurricane Claim Litigation
On June 22, 2007 the Company filed suit, in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois (Case
No. 07CH16548), against its insurance carriers, Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Essex Insurance
Company, Lexington Insurance Company, and Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company, regarding a
coverage dispute arising from losses suffered by the Company as a result of hurricanes that
occurred in Florida in 2004 and 2005. The Company also brought claims against Aon Risk Services,
Inc. of Illinois, the Companys insurance broker, regarding the procurement of appropriate
insurance coverage for the Company. The Company is seeking declaratory relief establishing the
coverage obligations of its carriers, as well as a judgment for breach of contract, breach of the
covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unfair settlement practices and, as to Aon, for failure to
provide ordinary care in the selling and procuring of insurance. The claims involved in this action
exceed $11 million.
In response to motions to dismiss, the trial court dismissed: (1) the requests for declaratory
relief as being duplicative of the claims for breach of contract and (2) certain of the breach of
contract claims as being not ripe until the limits of underlying insurance policies have been
exhausted. On or about January 28, 2008, the Company filed its Second Amended Complaint. Aon
filed a motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint in its entirety as against Aon, and the
insurers moved to dismiss portions of the Second Amended Complaint as against them. The insurers
motion was denied and they have now answered the Second Amended Complaint. Aons motion was
granted, with leave granted to the Company to file an amended pleading containing greater factual
specificity. The Company did so by adding to the Second Amended Complaint a new Count VII against
Aon, which the Company filed on August 15, 2008. Aon then answered the new Count VII in part and
moved to strike
F-37
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 17 Commitments and Contingencies (continued)
certain of its allegations. The Court left Count VII undisturbed, except for ruling that the
Companys alternative claim that Aon was negligent in carrying out its duty to give notice to
certain of the insurance carriers on the Companys behalf should be re-pleaded in the form of a
breach of contract theory. On February 2, 2009, the Company filed such a claim in the form of a
new Count VIII against Aon. Written discovery proceedings have commenced.
Since filing the lawsuit, the Company has received additional payments from Essex Insurance
Company, Lexington Insurance Company, and Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company, of
approximately $2.6 million. In January 2008 the Company entered a settlement with Hartford Fire
Insurance Company pursuant to which Hartford paid the Company the remaining disputed limits of
Hartfords insurance policy, in the amount of approximately $516,000, and the Company dismissed and
released Hartford from additional claims for interest and bad faith claims handling.
California and Washington Wage Claim Class Actions
On October 16, 2008, the Company was served with a class action lawsuit in California state
court filed by a single named plaintiff. The suit alleges that, at the time of the PA Transaction,
the Company and other named defendants willfully failed to pay former California employees of
Privileged Access and its affiliates (PA) who became employees of the Company all of the wages
they earned during their employment with PA, including accrued vacation time. The suit also
alleges that the Company improperly stripped those employees of their seniority. The suit
asserts claims for alleged violation of the California Labor Code; alleged violation of the
California Business & Professions Code and for alleged unfair business practices; alleged breach of
contract; alleged breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing; and for alleged unjust
enrichment. The complaint seeks, among other relief, compensatory and statutory damages;
restitution; pre-judgment and post-judgment interest; attorneys fees, expenses and costs;
penalties; and exemplary and punitive damages. The complaint does not specify a dollar amount
sought. On December 18, 2008, the Company filed a demurrer seeking dismissal of the complaint in
its entirety without leave to amend. The hearing on the demurrer is set for March 13, 2009. The
plaintiffs responsive brief is not yet due. The Company will vigorously defend the lawsuit.
On December 16, 2008, the Company was served with a class action lawsuit in Washington state
court filed by a single named plaintiff, represented by the same counsel as the plaintiff in the
California class action. The complaint asserts on behalf of a putative class of Washington
employees of PA who became employees of the Company substantially similar allegations as are
alleged in the California class action. The Companys response to the complaint is not yet due
and the Company has not yet filed a response. The Company will vigorously defend the lawsuit.
Brennan Beach
The Law Enforcement Division of the New York Department of Environmental Compliance (DEC)
has investigated certain allegations relating to the operation of the onsite wastewater treatment
plant and the use of adjacent wetlands at Brennan Beach, which is located in Pulaski, New York.
The allegations included assertions of unlawful point source discharges, permit discharge
exceedances, and placing material in a wetland buffer area without a permit. Representatives of
the Company attended meetings with the DEC in November 2007, April 2008, May 2008 and June 2008, at
which the alleged violations were discussed, and the Company has cooperated with the DEC
investigation. No formal notices have been issued to the Company asserting specific violations,
but the DEC has indicated that it believes the Company is responsible for certain of the alleged
violations. As a result of discussions with the DEC, the Company has agreed to enter into a civil
consent order pursuant to which the Company will pay a penalty of $50,000 and undertake an
environmental benefit project at a cost of $150,000 in connection with the alleged violations. The
consent order is being prepared by the DEC pursuant to that agreement and the amounts expected to
be paid under the consent order were accrued as property operating expenses during the quarter
ended June 30, 2008.
F-38
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 17 Commitments and Contingencies (continued)
Appalachian RV
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has undertaken an investigation of potential
lead contamination at Appalachian RV, which is located in Shartlesville, Pennsylvania, reportedly
stemming from observations of remnants of old auto battery parts at the Property. In late November
and early December 2007, the EPA conducted an assessment by taking samples of surface soil,
sediment, surface water, and well water at the Property. The Company is cooperating with the EPA.
In March 2008, the EPA issued a report regarding the findings of the sampling (EPA Report).
The EPA Report found no elevated concentrations of lead in either the sediment samples, surface
water samples, or well water samples. However, out of the more than 800 soil samples the EPA took,
which were collected from locations throughout the Property, the EPA Report identified elevated
levels of lead in 61 samples.
Following issuance of the EPA Report, the EPA sent the Company a Notice of Potential Liability
for a cleanup of the elevated lead levels at the Property, and a proposed administrative consent
order seeking the Companys agreement to conduct such a cleanup. On April 9, 2008, the Company
submitted a response suggesting that the Company conduct additional soil testing, which the EPA
approved, to determine what type of cleanup might be appropriate.
The EPA also advised the Company that, because elevated arsenic levels were detected at six
locations at the Property during the EPAs testing for lead, at the suggestion of the Agency for
Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), the EPA further analyzed for potentially elevated
arsenic levels the samples it previously collected. As a result of that analysis, the Company
engaged a laboratory to analyze those samples for elevated arsenic levels. In light of these
results, the additional soil testing the Company is conducting will test for arsenic as well as
lead.
The additional soil testing commenced in July 2008 and was completed in August 2008. Based on
the results of the additional soil testing, the Company entered a contract with an environmental
consulting company to remediate the site and, with the permission of the EPA, submitted a notice of
intent to remediate the site under the supervision of the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental
Protection. The contaminated soil has been excavated and stockpiled, will be delivered to
facilities approved for receiving such contaminated waste, and has been replaced at the property by
clean fill.
In addition, the local township in which the Property is located issued a notice of violation
regarding the operation of the wastewater system with respect to various sites at the Property.
The Company is in discussions with the Township regarding connecting portions of the Property to
the Townships sewer system, resolving the issues raised by the notice of violation, and
eliminating or reducing any potential penalties associated with the notice of violation. While the
outcome is still uncertain, the amount of eventual penalties, if any, is not expected to be
material.
As a result of these circumstances, the Company decided not to open the Property until these
issues can be resolved. In addition, although the potential costs of addressing the environmental
issues at the Property are uncertain, based upon information to date, a liability of approximately
$0.4 million for future estimated costs is accrued as of December 31, 2008. Based on the
information currently available to the Company, the Company expects to be able to re-open the
Property in time for the 2009 season.
Gulf View in Punta Gorda
In 2004, the Company acquired ownership of various property owning entities, including an
entity owning a property called Gulf View, in Punta Gorda, Florida. Gulf View continues to be held
in a special purpose entity. At the time of acquisition of the entity owning Gulf View, it was
financed with a secured loan that was cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted with a loan on
another property whose ownership entity was not acquired. At the time of acquisition, the
Operating Partnership guaranteed certain obligations relating to exceptions from the non-recourse
nature of the loans. Because of certain penalties associated with repayment of these loans, the
loans have not been restructured and the terms and conditions remain the same today. The
approximate outstanding amount of the loan secured by Gulf View is $1.4 million and of the crossed
loan secured by the other property is $5.5 million. The Company is not aware of any notice of
default regarding either of the loans; however, should the owner of the cross-collateralized
property default, the special purpose entity owning Gulf View and the Operating Partnership may be
impacted to the extent of their obligations.
F-39
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 17 Commitments and Contingencies (continued)
Florida Utility Operations
The Company received notice from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP)
that as a result of a compliance inspection it is alleging violations of Florida law relating to
the operation of onsite water plants and wastewater treatment plants at seven properties in
Florida. The alleged violations relate to record keeping and reporting requirements, physical and
operating deficiencies and permit compliance. The Company has investigated each of the alleged
violations, including a review of a third party operator hired to oversee such operations. The
Company met with the DEP in November 2007 to respond to the alleged violations and as a follow-up
to such meeting provided a written response to the DEP in December 2007. In light of the Companys
written response, in late January 2008 the DEP conducted a follow-up compliance inspection at each
of the seven properties. In early March 2008, the DEP provided the Company comments in connection
with the follow-up inspection, which made various recommendations and raised certain additional
alleged violations similar in character to those alleged after the initial inspection. The Company
has investigated and responded to the additional alleged violations. While the outcome of this
investigation remains uncertain, the Company expects to resolve the issues raised by the DEP by
entering into a consent decree in which the Company will agree to make certain improvements in its
facilities and operations to resolve the issues and pay certain costs and penalties associated with
the violations. In August 2008, the DEP provided the Company a proposed consent order for
resolving the issues raised by the DEP, the details of which the Company negotiated with the DEP.
On December 2, 2008, a Consent Order was entered resolving the issues raised by the DEP. Pursuant
to the Consent Order, the Company paid $5,000 for costs incurred by the DEP. The Company also
agreed to pay a penalty of $113,499, which is subject to reduction in the event the Company elects
to perform in-kind capital improvement projects that the DEP approves. The Company has proposed
one such project and may propose another, subject to DEP approval. Accordingly, the amount of the
$113,499 penalty that the Company will ultimately be required to pay is not yet certain. The
Company also replaced its third party operator hired to oversee onsite water and wastewater
operations at each of the seven properties. The Company is evaluating the costs of any
improvements to its facilities, which would be capital expenditures depreciated over the estimated
useful life of the improvement. During the course of this investigation, one permit for operation
of a wastewater treatment plant expired. The Company applied for renewal of the permit and expects
the DEP to grant the application after certain determinations and capital improvements are made.
In the meantime, the Company is permitted to operate the wastewater treatment plant pursuant to the
Consent Order.
Other
The Company is involved in various other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of
business. Such proceedings include, but are not limited to, notices, consent decrees, additional
permit requirements and other similar enforcement actions by governmental agencies relating to the
Companys water and wastewater treatment plants and other waste treatment facilities.
Additionally, in the ordinary course of business, the Companys operations are subject to audit by
various taxing authorities. Management believes that all proceedings herein described or referred
to, taken together, are not expected to have a material adverse impact on the Company. In
addition, to the extent any such proceedings or audits relate to newly acquired Properties, the
Company considers any potential indemnification obligations of sellers in favor of the Company.
F-40
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 18 Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)
The following is unaudited quarterly data for 2008 and 2007 (amounts in thousands, except for
per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
Second |
|
Third |
|
Fourth |
|
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
2008 |
|
3/31 |
|
6/30 |
|
9/30 |
|
12/31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues (a) |
|
$ |
123,205 |
|
|
$ |
110,909 |
|
|
$ |
118,578 |
|
|
$ |
116,449 |
|
Consolidated income from continuing operations (a) |
|
$ |
19,745 |
|
|
$ |
9,064 |
|
|
$ |
5,814 |
|
|
$ |
3,943 |
|
Income from discontinued operations (a) |
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
Net income (loss) available for Common Shares |
|
$ |
12,725 |
|
|
$ |
4,109 |
|
|
$ |
1,482 |
|
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding Basic |
|
|
24,200 |
|
|
|
24,370 |
|
|
|
24,527 |
|
|
|
24,765 |
|
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding Diluted |
|
|
30,386 |
|
|
|
30,540 |
|
|
|
30,572 |
|
|
|
30,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per Common Share outstanding Basic |
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
Net income per Common Share outstanding
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
Second |
|
Third |
|
Fourth |
|
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
2007 |
|
3/31 |
|
6/30 |
|
9/30 |
|
12/31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues (a) |
|
$ |
119,031 |
|
|
$ |
105,689 |
|
|
$ |
110,699 |
|
|
$ |
106,482 |
|
Consolidated income from continuing operations (a) |
|
$ |
19,375 |
|
|
$ |
6,048 |
|
|
$ |
9,038 |
|
|
$ |
9,161 |
|
Income from discontinued operations (a) |
|
$ |
4,706 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
6,954 |
|
|
$ |
647 |
|
Net income available for Common Shares |
|
$ |
16,160 |
|
|
$ |
1,634 |
|
|
$ |
9,652 |
|
|
$ |
4,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding Basic |
|
|
23,910 |
|
|
|
24,133 |
|
|
|
24,148 |
|
|
|
24,161 |
|
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding
Diluted |
|
|
30,351 |
|
|
|
30,431 |
|
|
|
30,418 |
|
|
|
30,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per Common Share outstanding Basic |
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
Net income per Common Share outstanding
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Amounts may differ from previously disclosed amounts due to reclassification of discontinued operations. |
F-41